2011
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-746-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living together in multi-ethnic neighbourhoods

Abstract: PART IV. Everyday life in Nijmegen and Utrecht 7. Narratives of public spaces 7.1 Goffertpark: a dynamic world of strangers 7.2 Thiemepark: an inclusive neighbourhood park 7.3 Kanaalstraat: confronting the non-ordinary in a multicultural shopping street 7.4 Molenpark: domination leads to exclusion 7.5 Bankaplein: a familiar space that leads to interactions 7.6 Muntplein: withdrawing into your own bubble 7.7 Conclusion 8. Connecting being in public space and everyday multicultural life in a neighbourhood 8.1 So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 176 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted that urban parks are not places where unsolicited interactions often take place (Gobster 2002). Other scholars claimed that despite their fleeting character, interactions in parks can contribute to developing a sense of belonging (Peters 2011;Stodolska, Peters, Horolets, 2017) or attachment (Neal et al 2015). Also, there are individuals and arrangements that can initiate such contacts (cf.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that urban parks are not places where unsolicited interactions often take place (Gobster 2002). Other scholars claimed that despite their fleeting character, interactions in parks can contribute to developing a sense of belonging (Peters 2011;Stodolska, Peters, Horolets, 2017) or attachment (Neal et al 2015). Also, there are individuals and arrangements that can initiate such contacts (cf.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%