“…These works have fleshed out the occupational dynamics and professional culture of correctional officers, and several aspects of this occupation are now well documented. Most officers are male (Britton, 2003), and many enjoy high-risk edgework (Stout et al, 2018). Unsurprisingly, this results in a widespread culture of hypermasculinity (Ricciardelli, 2019), which manifests in specific officer codes, or more generally as a workplace habitus (Arnold et al, 2012;Lerman & Page, 2012).…”
The number of people incarcerated for extremist actions has grown over the past decades. The resulting prospect of prison radicalization has contributed to widespread risk responsibilitization among prison staff. Low-level correctional officers now perceive themselves as being directly responsible for detecting radicalization on their units. Consequently, radicalization has become a meaningful topic for prison staff, one which shapes their daily actions and perceptions. However, officers’ understandings of radicalization may not conform with accepted definitions. Through 131 semistructured interviews with Canadian correctional officers, we demonstrate how radicalization functions as a floating signifier in prison, influencing officer thought and behavior in meaningful ways while eluding easy definition. Officers redefine radicalization to fit interpretive frames around religion and race, gang membership, and mental health, irrespective of whether stereotypical extremists exist in a given prison. We demonstrate how radicalization, when operating as a floating signifier, can significantly influence officers’ perceptions and front-line prison operations.
“…These works have fleshed out the occupational dynamics and professional culture of correctional officers, and several aspects of this occupation are now well documented. Most officers are male (Britton, 2003), and many enjoy high-risk edgework (Stout et al, 2018). Unsurprisingly, this results in a widespread culture of hypermasculinity (Ricciardelli, 2019), which manifests in specific officer codes, or more generally as a workplace habitus (Arnold et al, 2012;Lerman & Page, 2012).…”
The number of people incarcerated for extremist actions has grown over the past decades. The resulting prospect of prison radicalization has contributed to widespread risk responsibilitization among prison staff. Low-level correctional officers now perceive themselves as being directly responsible for detecting radicalization on their units. Consequently, radicalization has become a meaningful topic for prison staff, one which shapes their daily actions and perceptions. However, officers’ understandings of radicalization may not conform with accepted definitions. Through 131 semistructured interviews with Canadian correctional officers, we demonstrate how radicalization functions as a floating signifier in prison, influencing officer thought and behavior in meaningful ways while eluding easy definition. Officers redefine radicalization to fit interpretive frames around religion and race, gang membership, and mental health, irrespective of whether stereotypical extremists exist in a given prison. We demonstrate how radicalization, when operating as a floating signifier, can significantly influence officers’ perceptions and front-line prison operations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.