Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity

. (2015) 'Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems.', Applied geography., 56 . pp. 199-208. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog. 2014.11.019 Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Geography. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A denitive version was subsequently published in Applied Geography, 56, January 2015, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014 Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

show abstract

“…This has led to recognition that inter-or transdisciplinary methodologies are required (Horlick-Jones & Sime 2004;Petts et al 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These internal conflicts can impede one's ability to adequately share information, trust a team or network, and even hamper the advancement of a science program especially if knowledge is withheld as a result of such insecurities . Loss aversion (Fox & Faver, 1984;Georghiou, 1988;Sonnenwald, 2007), lack of recognition and reward (Dasgupta & David, 1994;Turpin & Garrett-Jones, 2010), concerns about achieving promotion and tenure (Carayol & Thi, 2005;Coleman, 1986;Harris, Lyon, & Clarke, 2009;Horlick-Jones & Sime, 2004;Maglaughlin & Sonnenwald, 2005;Rhoten & Parker, 2004;Zucker, 2012), and authorship embattlements (Barrett, Funk, & Macrina, 2005;Lewis, Ross, & Holden, 2012;Stokols et al, 2008) are just a few of the issues that can ensue from within a scientific team that struggles with diverse attitudes about knowledge sharing.…”

Section: Attitudes About Ownership Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

Shifting Paradigms in Information Flow: An Open Science Framework (OSF) for Knowledge Sharing Teams

Potterbusch

Lotrecchiano

2018

InformingSciJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim/Purpose: This paper explores the implications of machine-mediated communication on human interaction in cross-disciplinary teams. The authors explore the relationships between Open Science Theory, its contributions to team science, and the opportunities and challenges associated with adopting open science principles. Background: Open Science Theory impacts many aspects of human interaction throughout the scholarly life cycle and can be seen in action through various technologies, which each typically touch only one such aspect. By serving multiple aspects of Open Science Theory at once, the Open Science Framework (OSF) serves as an exemplar technology. As such it illustrates how Open Science Theory can inform and expand cognitive and behavioral dynamics in teams at multiple levels in a single tool. Methodology: This concept paper provides a theoretical rationale for recommendations for exploring the connections between an open science paradigm and the dynamics of team communication. As such theory and evidence have been culled to initiate a synthesis of the nascent literature, current practice and theory. Contribution: This paper aims to illuminate the shared goals between open science and the study of teams by focusing on science team activities (data management, methods, algorithms, and outputs) as focal objects for further combined study. Findings: Team dynamics and characteristics that will affect successful human/machine assisted interactions through mediators of workflow culture, attitudes about ownership of knowledge, readiness to share openly, shifts from group-driven to user-driven functionality, group-organizing to self-organizing structures, and the development of trust as teams regulate between traditional and open science dissemination. Recommendations for Practitioners: Participation in open science practices through machine-assisted technologies in team projects/scholarship should be encouraged. Recommendation for Researchers: The information provided highlights areas in need of further study in team science as well as new primary sources of material in the study of teams utilizing machine-assisted methods in their work. Impact on Society: As researchers take on more complex social problems, new technology and open science practices can complement the work of diverse stakeholders while also providing opportunities to broaden impact and intensify scholarly contributions. Future Research: Future investigation into the cognitive and behavioral research conducted with teams that employ machine-assisted technologies in their workflows would offer researchers the opportunity to understand better the relationships between intelligent machines and science teams’ impacts on their communities as well as the necessary paradigmatic shifts inherent when utilizing these technologies.

show abstract

“…Fifth, transdisciplinary approaches tend to be relatively tractable when the phenomenon in question requires a close and prolonged period of inspection from a range of different vantage points, notably where those subsequent angles or areas of sustained inspection may not be relatively knowable up front (Horlick-Jones & Sime, 2004). This is advantageous, for instance, when diasporic outlooks on self and society are inclined to be transcultural (i.e., osmotic towards a number of different cultural inheritances on "locations") and promissory other than culturally stable and/or cosmologically steadfast-as the companion article by Hollinshead suggested.…”

Section: The Ontological Commitmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diasporas Disentangled: The Cultivation of an Open/Spiral Imagination in Tourism Studies

Ivanova¹,

Hollinshead²

2015

Tourism Culture & Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This companion article by Ivanova and Hollinshead seeks to show how "the changing same of the diasporic imaginal" (after Leroi Jones, via Gilroy) often conceivably constitutes "a wicked problem" (after Brown, Harris, and Russell) that is often so complex in its characteristics that hard and fast definitions about it (and solutions for its problematics) are not easy to conjure up. Thus, in order to monitor how ethnic, cultural, and historic codes are switched and hybridized in and through the inconstant identifications of diasporic senses of inheritance and aspiration, this article endeavors to show how transdisciplinary lines of inspection may prove useful. Taken in tandem with the previous article by Hollinshead, the two dovetailed articles thereby comprise no tributary celebration of the purity of ethnic or national culture, but one that indeed demands a high degree of open interpretive imagination if such matters of ambivalence and ambiguity are to be gradually and meaningfully deciphered.

show abstract

Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity

Cited by 184 publications

References 33 publications

Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems

Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems

Shifting Paradigms in Information Flow: An Open Science Framework (OSF) for Knowledge Sharing Teams

Diasporas Disentangled: The Cultivation of an Open/Spiral Imagination in Tourism Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About