2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0026749x11000904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living in the Material World: Cosmopolitanism and trade in early twentieth century Ladakh

Abstract: The historical trading communities of early twentieth century Ladakh, in northern India, interacted with multiple cultures through both travel and the flow of trade goods. Using a neo-pragmatic philosophical framework, I will argue that this community-largely rural and commonly thought of as isolated-was, in fact, cosmopolitan. The traders' interactions with specific commodities prompted them to traverse cultural boundaries and engage with new ideas. This view of cosmopolitanism suggests that, while particular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergent, partial and contested rural cosmopolitanism of late colonial Queensland was far from the ideal of cosmopolitan theory, but so is the 'actually-existing cosmopolitanism' of twenty-first-century rural and urban societies (Robbins 1998;Ley 2004;Woods 2017). In common with the proto-cosmopolitanism identified in eighteenth-century Jamaica by Robertson (2014) or in early twentieth-century Ladakh by Fewkes (2012), the cosmopolitanism of late colonial Cairns was a cosmopolitanism of its time: partial, imperfect, constrained by cultural norms, and precarious. Indeed, it is its partiality and precarity that makes the case especially pertinent to contemporary debates around immigration and rural communities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The emergent, partial and contested rural cosmopolitanism of late colonial Queensland was far from the ideal of cosmopolitan theory, but so is the 'actually-existing cosmopolitanism' of twenty-first-century rural and urban societies (Robbins 1998;Ley 2004;Woods 2017). In common with the proto-cosmopolitanism identified in eighteenth-century Jamaica by Robertson (2014) or in early twentieth-century Ladakh by Fewkes (2012), the cosmopolitanism of late colonial Cairns was a cosmopolitanism of its time: partial, imperfect, constrained by cultural norms, and precarious. Indeed, it is its partiality and precarity that makes the case especially pertinent to contemporary debates around immigration and rural communities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet this assumption has been increasingly challenged both by research aimed at uncovering minority ethnic histories in rural societies (Bressey 2009) and by studies that have documented evidence of historical cosmopolitanism in essentially rural peripheral or borderland locations. Fewkes (2012), for instance, has argued that cosmopolitan communities existed in the rural Ladakh region in northern India in the early twentieth century, as involvement in the global trade of commodities such as cotton, synthetic dyes and opiates created cross-cultural interactions and required traders in the region to understand and negotiate global markets and cultural differences. Robertson (2014), meanwhile, describes the 'ambivalent cosmopolitanism' of eighteenthcentury Jamaica, as ideas and cultural fashions from Europe were circulated through the institutions and networks of colonial towns and to rural plantations.…”
Section: Retrofitting Rural Cosmopolitanism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After closing off of the two borders with China and Pakistan, Leh town was transformed into a remote cut-off place in popular Indian psyche. With the closing of centuries' famous trade route known popularly as the Silk Route, Leh town took a U-turn from a cosmopolitan outlook towards one of the remotest places in India (Fewkes 2012).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engagement requires treating others with civility and taking them seriously as social actors-what we might consider respect. Thus, communitarian approaches examine the networked quotidian social interactions of all the people who actually live in a place, and these approaches consider a place cosmopolitan because a significant proportion of people living there have regular social interactions that engage across differences (e.g., Lewis 2009;Fewkes 2014).…”
Section: Gendering Cosmopolitanismmentioning
confidence: 99%