2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2011.6115708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver tumor detection in CT images by adaptive contrast enhancement and the EM/MPM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, it was compared with adaptively regularized kernel-based FCM (ARKFCM) [44], DRLSE [45], MAXENTROY [46], EM/MPM [47], continuous max-flow (CMF) [48], and OTSU [12]. MAXENTROPY, CMF, and OTSU methods are parameterless.…”
Section: Segmentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, it was compared with adaptively regularized kernel-based FCM (ARKFCM) [44], DRLSE [45], MAXENTROY [46], EM/MPM [47], continuous max-flow (CMF) [48], and OTSU [12]. MAXENTROPY, CMF, and OTSU methods are parameterless.…”
Section: Segmentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billelo et al [10] utilized intensity-based histogram and liver contour refinement to segment liver tumors, followed by an SVM to sift out false alarms. Masuda et al [11] described a method to segment liver tumors by enhancing the CT scan contrast levels and expectation maximization of the posterior marginal. This super-voxel method, called EM/MPM, produced candidates that were then filtered using shape and location information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%