2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the monocytes from ACR patients also showed an enhanced differentiation capacity in phase 2, as indicated by the increased diversity of monocytes, such as the increased proportions of CD14 + FOS + monocytes and CD14 + AP-1 + monocytes. The relatively strong immune responses within 90 days after LT may explain at least in part why the tacrolimus medication guideline recommends potent target tacrolimus trough concentration 56 , 57 and why acute rejections usually occur within the first 3 months after LT. 66 , 67 All of these findings in phases 2 and 3 indicate that LT patients are more susceptible to acute rejection in these phases, and the FOS-expressing monocytes in phase 2 and inflamed NK cells spanning from phases 2 to 3 may be predictive biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for clinical management and graft rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, the monocytes from ACR patients also showed an enhanced differentiation capacity in phase 2, as indicated by the increased diversity of monocytes, such as the increased proportions of CD14 + FOS + monocytes and CD14 + AP-1 + monocytes. The relatively strong immune responses within 90 days after LT may explain at least in part why the tacrolimus medication guideline recommends potent target tacrolimus trough concentration 56 , 57 and why acute rejections usually occur within the first 3 months after LT. 66 , 67 All of these findings in phases 2 and 3 indicate that LT patients are more susceptible to acute rejection in these phases, and the FOS-expressing monocytes in phase 2 and inflamed NK cells spanning from phases 2 to 3 may be predictive biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for clinical management and graft rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The activation of T cells by APCs also encompasses a semi‐indirect pathway. This pathway involves T cell activation signaling, costimulatory receptors on T cells (CD28, CD40), corresponding ligands on APCs (CD40L, CD80, CD86), and the microenvironment that triggers T cell activation 260 . KCs also mediates the T cell response and secondary apoptosis of other immune cells through cytokines 261,262 .…”
Section: Immune Response To Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that peripheral blood Treg in the immune-tolerant group was first enriched after LT followed by a remarkable decay, but no Treg enrichment was observed in the immune rejection patients. Additionally, Aldo et al proposed to rule out the immune rejection based on ALT levels, serum donor-specific HLA antibodies, and liver stiffness by FibroScan [82]. Although many non-invasive biomarkers of immune tolerance have been proposed, future studies are required to validate their efficiency.…”
Section: Immune Tolerance Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%