1995
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver resection without blood transfusion

Abstract: A retrospective study was carried out of 522 elective liver resections to determine the impact of blood transfusion on the immediate postoperative outcome and on long-term survival. The number of liver resections without transfusion has increased in recent years, as a result of improvement in surgical technique with less blood loss during operation and more careful choice of the timing of transfusion. In resections carried out in the past 5 years, the indication for intraoperative transfusion was restricted an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
98
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mariette et al 22 demonstrated that age was significantly associated with the need for transfusion because elderly patients have poor tolerance for anaemia. Gozzetti et al 17 reported that serum albumin and bilirubin levels were significantly correlated with the need for blood transfusion during resection for HCC arising in the cirrhotic liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mariette et al 22 demonstrated that age was significantly associated with the need for transfusion because elderly patients have poor tolerance for anaemia. Gozzetti et al 17 reported that serum albumin and bilirubin levels were significantly correlated with the need for blood transfusion during resection for HCC arising in the cirrhotic liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In addition, bleeding and blood transfusion are risk factors for postoperative morbidity and in some reports, long-term cancer recurrence. 6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, blood products are sometimes scarce and associated with appreciable expense. Thus, there is compelling rationale to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion as much as possible in patients undergoing liver resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in blood loss and consequent decreases in transfusion requirements have been shown to improve outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection for tumors. 9 Despite its well-documented benefits, IIO has not been adopted by most transplant centers performing LDLT. 10 We evaluated the role of IIO in living donor hepatectomy and compared our findings to results in an historic series of similar procedures performed without IIO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%