2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-and two-year survival was 80% and 65%, respectively. This finding agreed with Parisi et al [16] who concluded that surgical resection improved the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in comparison with RFA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One-and two-year survival was 80% and 65%, respectively. This finding agreed with Parisi et al [16] who concluded that surgical resection improved the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in comparison with RFA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…percutaneous ethanol injection, microwave, RFA, and brachytherapy) may be effective and feasible in the treatment of HCC patients who are not suitable for resection. [16] Among these, RFA may be beneficial to more patients than the others because of its large coagulated necrosis, fewer treatment sessions, and higher survival rates. [17][18][19][20] Rare studies have evaluated the results of treatment with RFA, by comparing it to liver resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the various local ablation techniques, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted the greatest interest and is the most commonly used treatment modality for small liver cancers in adults with preserved liver function reserve and for a variety of extra-hepatic sites, including the lung 6 and musculoskeletal system 7 . RFA has been reported to achieve a complete response comparable to the response obtained with surgical liver resection with a lower morbidity rate of 5–18% 8 9 10 and a lower mortality rate of 0–1.4% 10 11 12 . Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) is also an effective treatment that has been widely used in patients with small tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recent retrospective studies from Japan and Italy evaluated SR and RFA in patients with small HCC and found similar results: Both studies showed similar OS rates but a higher recurrence rate for RFA [23][24][25][26]. LH may thus have advantages regarding tumor removal, while RFA may have advantage in relation to minimal invasiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%