Liver elastography can predict degree of advanced fibrosis for autoimmune hepatitis in biochemical remission

Abstract

Background and Aim The aim was to analyze the concordance of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) either by transient elastography (TE) or ARFI with liver biopsy in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients with biochemical remission and to identify those with histological remission. Liver biopsy is still the golden standard for AIH diagnosis. However, it is an invasive procedure and these patients, most of the time, require many biopsies, so it would be valuable to search for noninvasive method that could select all these patients and keep under observation. Methods Thirty‐three patients with AIH were submitted for liver biopsy to evaluate histological remission after at least 18 months of normal aminotransferases. The efficiency of LSM and fibrosis stages was tested by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUROC). Results One patient (3%) was F0, 6 (18.2%) were F1, 8 (24.2%) were F2, 10 (30.3%) were F3, and 8 (24.2%) were F4, according to METAVIR. Thirteen of thirty‐three (39.4%) patients did not achieve histological remission. AUROC for F4 stage was 0.83 (IC: 0.76–0.99) for TE and 0.78 (IC: 0.65–0.95) for ARFI. Optimal LSM cutoff values were 12.3 kPa (Se = 87.5%, Sp = 88%) for TE and 1.65 m/s (Se = 87.5%, Sp = 76%) for ARFI. The tests were unable to differentiate patients with histological activity from those in histological remission (P < 0.05). Conclusion TE and ARFI accurately identify liver fibrosis by METAVIR score in AIH patients with biochemical remission. No cutoff value was detected to indicate whether the patient achieved histological remission.

Efficacy of Serum Ferritin–Zinc Ratio for Predicting Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis

“…Although convenient to use, it is not suitable for patients taking hypotensive drugs such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. Radiological tools, such as Shear-wave TM , Fibro-scan TM , and Elastgraphy TM , are not universally prevalent in many medical facilities but are simple and convenient to use [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”