1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00201803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Live” neuron and optimal learning rule

Abstract: A concept of the live unit as an automatic regulation system with a few admissible states areas in the space of states is considered. Energetic profit of oscillatory behavior consisting in the consecutive transitions of system from one admissible states area to another is shown. It is stated, that external disturbances cause the energy consumption of oscillatory system to decrease. On the basis of this concept and some neurophysiological data, the "live" energy-consuming nonlinear three-state neuron model is p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ξ 1 and ξ 2 are constants: 1 ≥ ξ 1 > 0 quantifies the credibility score loss (forgetting), while the term with ξ 2 > 0 means that every time the agent i activates, its score increases proportional to the weight τ ki (t) of its influence on k. If i is not active, m i (t) = 0, its score decays. Development of complex network theory motivated many models, where the links and nodes are coupled [46,47,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]; see [82] for an extensive review. Neurophysiological motivation for studying such models comes from the synaptic plasticity of neuronal connections that can change on various time scales [65,83].…”
Section: Credibility Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ξ 1 and ξ 2 are constants: 1 ≥ ξ 1 > 0 quantifies the credibility score loss (forgetting), while the term with ξ 2 > 0 means that every time the agent i activates, its score increases proportional to the weight τ ki (t) of its influence on k. If i is not active, m i (t) = 0, its score decays. Development of complex network theory motivated many models, where the links and nodes are coupled [46,47,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]; see [82] for an extensive review. Neurophysiological motivation for studying such models comes from the synaptic plasticity of neuronal connections that can change on various time scales [65,83].…”
Section: Credibility Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of work on collective activity patterns in neuronal systems [30][31][32][33][34][35]. This activity relates to proactive functions of the brain, e.g., attention and memory [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%