2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live load distribution equations for integral bridge substructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of a lot of numerical and experimental works in passive pressure evaluation, the behaviour of this type of bridges has not already been well defined (Dicleli, Erhan 2010;Erhan, Dicleli 2009;Fang et al 1994Fang et al , 2002Fang, Ishibashi 1986;James, Bransby 1970;Kim, Laman 2010b;Noorzaei et al 2010).…”
Section: Fig 2 a Schematic View Of Integral Bridges Abutmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In spite of a lot of numerical and experimental works in passive pressure evaluation, the behaviour of this type of bridges has not already been well defined (Dicleli, Erhan 2010;Erhan, Dicleli 2009;Fang et al 1994Fang et al , 2002Fang, Ishibashi 1986;James, Bransby 1970;Kim, Laman 2010b;Noorzaei et al 2010).…”
Section: Fig 2 a Schematic View Of Integral Bridges Abutmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bu araştırmaların bir kısmında, üstyapı-uçayak sürekliliğinin ısıl yükler altındaki integral köprülerin performansı üzerine çalışmalar yapılmıştır [14,15]. İntegral köprülerde hareketli yük dağılımı ile ilgili çalışmalar yakın zamanda artış göstermiştir [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Bu çalışmalardan bazılarında Dicleli ve arkadaşları verevsiz integral köprülerin kirişleri ve altyapı elemanları için hareketli yük dağılım denklemleri geliştirmişlerdir [19,20].…”
Section: öNceki̇ çAlişmalarunclassified
“…This superstructure model is shown in Figure 3. Further details of this model and comparisons with other models (Imbsen and Nutt 1978;Brockenbrough 1986;Tarhini and Frederick 1992) available in the literature are summarized and discussed by Erhan and Dicleli (2009). Accordingly, the bridge slab is modeled using quadrilateral shell elements and the girders are modeled using 3-D frame elements as shown in the 3-D structural models presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Superstructure Modeling For Iabs and Ssbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to model the rigidity of the deck-abutment joint, the abutment's shell elements located within the joint area are assigned a large modulus of elasticity. Further details about these modeling techniques can be found in Erhan and Dicleli (2009). The abutment is divided into rectangular shell elements with a side length of 0.6 m in horizontal direction as compatible with the superstructure.…”
Section: Substructure Modeling For Iabsmentioning
confidence: 99%