2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2018.8351314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live Demonstration: Front and Back Illuminated Dynamic and Active Pixel Vision Sensors Comparison

Abstract: The demonstration shows the differences between two novel Dynamic and Active Pixel Vision Sensors (DAVIS). While both sensors are based on the same circuits and have the same resolution (346×260), they differ in their manufacturing. The first sensor is a DAVIS with standard Front Side Illuminated (FSI) technology and the second sensor is the first Back Side Illuminated (BSI) DAVIS sensor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-supervised methods use the grayscale images from a colocated camera (e.g., DAVIS [56]) as a supervisory signal: images are warped using the flow predicted by the ANN and their photometric consistency is used as loss function [34], [45], [46]. While such supervisory signal is easier to obtain than real-world GT flow, it may suffer from the limitations of frame-based cameras (e.g., motion blur and low dynamic range), consequently affecting the trained ANNs.…”
Section: Event-based Optical Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Semi-supervised methods use the grayscale images from a colocated camera (e.g., DAVIS [56]) as a supervisory signal: images are warped using the flow predicted by the ANN and their photometric consistency is used as loss function [34], [45], [46]. While such supervisory signal is easier to obtain than real-world GT flow, it may suffer from the limitations of frame-based cameras (e.g., motion blur and low dynamic range), consequently affecting the trained ANNs.…”
Section: Event-based Optical Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the indoor sequences do not have IMOs, and the outdoor sequences do not include scenes with IMOs in the benchmark evaluation. The event camera has 346 ⇥ 260 pixel resolution [56]. In total, we evaluate on 63.5 million events spanning 265 seconds.…”
Section: Datasets Metrics and Hyper-parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%