Live-cell imaging approaches for the investigation of xenobiotic-induced oxidant stress

Abstract

Background Oxidant stress is arguably a universal feature in toxicology. Research studies on the role of oxidant stress induced by xenobiotic exposures have typically relied on the identification of damaged biomolecules using a variety of conventional biochemical and molecular techniques. However, there is increasing evidence that low-level exposure to a variety of toxicants dysregulates cellular physiology by interfering with redox-dependent processes. Scope of review The study of events involved in redox toxicology requires methodology capable of detecting transient modifications at relatively low signal strength. This article reviews the advantages of live-cell imaging for redox toxicology studies. Major conclusions Toxicological studies with xenobiotics of supra-physiological reactivity require careful consideration when using fluorogenic sensors in order to avoid potential artifacts and false negatives. Fortunately, experiments conducted for the purpose of validating the use of these sensors in toxicological applications often yield unexpected insights into the mechanisms through which xenobiotic exposure induces oxidant stress. General significance Live-cell imaging using a new generation of small molecule and genetically encoded fluorophores with excellent sensitivity and specificity affords unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution that is optimal for redox toxicology studies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Air Pollution, edited by Wenjun Ding, Andrew J. Ghio and Weidong Wu.

Managing the challenge of drug-induced liver injury: a roadmap for the development and deployment of preclinical predictive models

“…increased activity of the Nrf2 stress response pathway). In the former case, there is evidence of inadequate specificity, risking misplaced biochemical perceptions, when using some of the older and technologically less demanding ROS assays [127][128][129] This platform represents a TIER 1 test system within the DILI roadmap (Figure 1), but could in principle be adapted to more complex models including 3D/spheroid cultures for use in Tier 2, where metabolic relevance is enhanced, as has been shown for HepG2 cultured in 3D 133 . In TIER 3, the transgenic Nrf2luc reporter mouse 134 has shown promise for detection of the Nrf2 response to drug-induced oxidative stress at the whole body level 135 .…”

Nanomaterials and Oxidative Stress

“…NPs also can play an antioxidant role by preventing or slowing oxidative reactions in a biological setting, also as radical scavengers, and these beneficial capabilities are actively sought for potential therapeutic applications in nanomedicine [12,13]. From a chemical standpoint, it is imperative to analyze oxidants and antioxidants in the context of its electron transfer partner(s) formal potential, as the same compound can have an opposite effect in a different cellular compartment [14].…”

“…Perhaps the most widespread experimental in vitro approach in nanomaterial-induced OS measurement embraces incubation with NPs, followed by the assessment of the oxidative damage to biomacromolecules [19][20][21] such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, or an appraisal of cellular antioxidant defenses [14]. Comparison with the non-exposed control group (aka "negative control") allows one to assess the relative magnitude of the NP-caused OS.…”

“…Presence of metallic NPs, however, will significantly quench the probe light emission [27]. The assays that measure the macromolecule damage and antioxidant production typically consume the sample and preclude a repeated collection of data from the same cell [14]. This may hinder the assessment of the OS at low dose levels over extended time periods that simulate the chronic NP exposure.…”

Fluorescent in vivo imaging of reactive oxygen species and redox potential in plants

“…Though DNA binding seems to be essential to the CellROX ® Green fluorescence, this fluorophore requires no further cellular processing and can be used for ROS extracellular measurements if DNA is present in the probe solution[92]. In contrast, CellROX ® Orange and CellROX ® Deep Red can be used in the cytosol as they do not require DNA binding to fluoresce[93]. Moreover, CellROX ® Deep Red shows higher stability than traditional oxidative stress fluorescent probes (e.g.…”