1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02874235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live and dead roots—their mass ratio in several grassland stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Bray (1963) reported a value as low as 340 g m -2 for timothy in the United States. However, our values were slightly lower than the 2049 to 2293 g m -2 measured to a depth of 15 cm by Tesarova et al (1982) for recultivated grasslands on two grass mixtures dominated by Phleum pratense L., Dactylis glomerata L., Alopecurus pratensis L. and Festuca pratensis Huds. receiving two different rates of fertilization.…”
Section: Root Biomasscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, Bray (1963) reported a value as low as 340 g m -2 for timothy in the United States. However, our values were slightly lower than the 2049 to 2293 g m -2 measured to a depth of 15 cm by Tesarova et al (1982) for recultivated grasslands on two grass mixtures dominated by Phleum pratense L., Dactylis glomerata L., Alopecurus pratensis L. and Festuca pratensis Huds. receiving two different rates of fertilization.…”
Section: Root Biomasscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Traditional soil blocks and soil cores (see Fiala, 1990a) were taken to the depth of 150 (200) mm for quantitative determination of total belowground dry mass (TBB) since roots were mostly concentrated in upper soil layers. The vital staining method with a solution of Congo red, developed by Ward et al (1978) and modified by Tesařová et al (1982), was used to determine the proportion of living and dead roots (see also van der Maarel, Titlyanova, 1989). Living and dead rhizomes and shoot bases were distinguished visually according to their colour and mechanical consistency.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monoliths were washed and the plant material collected in a 0.5 mm sieve. The below-ground plant material from small monoliths was dyed immediately after washing, following the technique proposed by Ward et al (1978) for cultivated annual species and successfully used for perennial meadow grasses and herbs by Tesarova, Fiala & Studeny (1982). Fresh roots are stained with a congored solution (1 mg congo-red per 100 ml of water) and then fixed in alcohol.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%