2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048x.2012.05746.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Little evidence that condition, stress indicators, sex ratio, or homozygosity are related to landscape or habitat attributes in declining woodland birds

Abstract: Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation are drivers of major declines in biodiversity and species extinctions. The actual causes of species population declines following habitat change are more difficult to discern and there is typically high covariation among the measures used to infer the causes of decline. The causes of decline may act directly on individual fitness and survival, or through disruption of population processes. We examined the relationships among configuration, extent and status of native… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amos et al . () found no relationship between habitat fragmentation, vegetation condition and haematocrit or residual body mass of several woodland bird species, including superb fairy‐wrens. They suggest that such metrics of condition may not be sufficiently sensitive to show any difference caused by habitat change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Amos et al . () found no relationship between habitat fragmentation, vegetation condition and haematocrit or residual body mass of several woodland bird species, including superb fairy‐wrens. They suggest that such metrics of condition may not be sufficiently sensitive to show any difference caused by habitat change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Neither habitat quality, nor the extent of tree‐cover, nor level of fragmentation in our study area influenced the body condition of fuscous honeyeaters, as assessed by morphometric and haematological variables (Amos et al . ). Thus, factors unrelated to reduced genetic connectivity or habitat quality (Ford et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This variable was found to be the strongest predictor of the presence of the fuscous honeyeater at a site (Radford and Bennett 2007) with values below the threshold of 17% corresponding to very low probability of species occurrence . Four site-scale vegetation condition scores, assessed for Amos et al (2013) using the 'habitat hectares' methodology (Parkes et al 2003) and believed to best represent habitat parameters relevant to breeding, feeding and vocalization of fuscous honeyeaters (Chan 1990), were included in the analysis. These were Large trees, number of large trees (with diameter at breast height greater than 0.7 m) per hectare (range 0-7, mean 2.4, SD 1.8 ), Tree height, average height (in meters) of all trees at a site (range 12-25.6, mean 13.7, SD 11.3), Canopy, projected percent of canopy cover by individual trees that are  80% of their mature height (range 15-30, mean 21, SD 4.0) and Shrubs, the sum of projected cover of small ( 1 m), medium (1-5 m) and large ( 5 m) shrubs (range 0-40, mean 13.7, SD 11.3; Supplementary material Appendix 1) (Parkes et al 2003).…”
Section: Landscape-and Site-scale Habitat Quality Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%