“…While this may be a cost-effective approach to expand the geographic scope and frequency of litter monitoring, it has its limitations. As discussed by Liu et al [ 28 ] about this type of approach, “small-sized objects in picture, luminance changes, moving occlusions and public facilities in ground all cause unexpected problems for litter detection.” Compared to image recognition, CS-based walking surveys can provide more accurate quantitative assessment, especially in the following conditions in cities: 1) when trash is partially degraded and blended within dry grass or bark, 2) areas not visible from common camera placement, e.g. behind bushes, 3) items that are smaller than surrounding items, especially in a low light situation.…”