2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57219-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf litter that is rich in N or poor in lignin (Cotrufo et al ., ; Prescott, ) has been shown to be positively correlated to the rate of leaf litter decomposition, at least in ecosystems where microbial activity dominates litter processing and/or Ca‐demanding earthworms are not abundant (Hobbie et al ., ). In the presence of earthworms, however, species differences in litter Ca have been found to determine litter decomposition rates, apparently because of the positive influence of litter Ca on earthworm populations (Reich et al ., ; Hobbie et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf litter that is rich in N or poor in lignin (Cotrufo et al ., ; Prescott, ) has been shown to be positively correlated to the rate of leaf litter decomposition, at least in ecosystems where microbial activity dominates litter processing and/or Ca‐demanding earthworms are not abundant (Hobbie et al ., ). In the presence of earthworms, however, species differences in litter Ca have been found to determine litter decomposition rates, apparently because of the positive influence of litter Ca on earthworm populations (Reich et al ., ; Hobbie et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less is known on biodiversity effects on other key ecosystem processes such as decomposition and nutrient cycling. The decomposition process of plant litter influences the release of essential plant nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and, thereby, exerts a large influence on the growth rates of plant species (e.g., Cotrufo et al 2000 ; Parton et al 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the forest in Collelongo, average annual estimates of heterotrophic respiration by all models were quite high (LPJ‐GUESS=3.9 t C ha −1 yr −1 , RHESSys=2.3 t C ha −1 yr −1 and ORCHIDEE=6.5 t C ha −1 yr −1 ) in comparison with observed values reported in the literature (0.8–1.2 ha −1 yr −1 according to Mollicone et al , 2003); this is likely to lead to an underestimation of simulated NEE fluxes at this site. Low soil temperatures during winter, summer drought stress, high percentage of clay in soil and aluminium content (Persson et al , 2000) along with low litter quality reported from this site (Cotrufo et al , 2000) are factors that could have limited heterotrophic respiration values in comparison with model estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%