1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7878(99)80007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Lithostratigraphy for mapping the Chalk of southern England’ by Bristow et al. (1997): discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gale, Wood & Bromley, 1987;Gale et al 1999a;Robinson, 1987;Mortimore, 1988;Bristow, 1999;Rawson, Allen & Gale, 2001;Peake, 2002;Woods et al 2002). Here, the traditional member subdivisions of the Cenomanian (Gale et al 1999a) are used, whereas the terminology of Gale (1996) is employed for the Turonian, and that of Gale, Wood & Bromley (1987) for the Coniacian-Campanian. This member terminology has been plotted against the lithostratigraphic logs of the Culver section for reference purposes.…”
Section: Study Sections 2a Stratigraphic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gale, Wood & Bromley, 1987;Gale et al 1999a;Robinson, 1987;Mortimore, 1988;Bristow, 1999;Rawson, Allen & Gale, 2001;Peake, 2002;Woods et al 2002). Here, the traditional member subdivisions of the Cenomanian (Gale et al 1999a) are used, whereas the terminology of Gale (1996) is employed for the Turonian, and that of Gale, Wood & Bromley (1987) for the Coniacian-Campanian. This member terminology has been plotted against the lithostratigraphic logs of the Culver section for reference purposes.…”
Section: Study Sections 2a Stratigraphic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). These changes did not find full favour with some Chalk stratigraphers (Gale and Hancock 1999;Bristow et al 1999).…”
Section: History Of the Currently Used Formational Schemementioning
confidence: 83%
“…BGS got in on the act when they realised that there was a demand for maps of southern England showing engineers how hard the chalk is, and they cobbled together a composite stratigraphical scheme using names they had coined whilst mapping Dorset, and those created by Mortimore in Sussex. A major criticism of this GCR book is that it applies the BGS scheme uncritically to all the English conservation sites (see comments in Gale & Hancock, 1999). After a general introduction, there follows a 54-page account of the biostratigraphy of the English Chalk which includes a number of spectacular fossil misidentifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%