2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithospheric structure of the Pampean flat slab region from double-difference tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the central part of the Pampean flat slab, two low‐velocity anomalies (M1 and M2) span a slab window along the inland projection of the JFR (Figure 2c and Profile [b] in Figure 3) and are surrounded by two high‐velocity limbs of the flat slab (H2). Though many prior works detected the Pampean flat slab with strong heterogeneities, most of seismological studies focused on the seismic structure south of 29°S (e.g., Linkimer et al., 2020; Marot et al., 2014; Porter et al., 2012; Wagner et al., 2005), leaving an observational gap from 27°29°S. In this study, events and stations north of 27°S are included in the inversion, allowing us to resolve M1 and M2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the central part of the Pampean flat slab, two low‐velocity anomalies (M1 and M2) span a slab window along the inland projection of the JFR (Figure 2c and Profile [b] in Figure 3) and are surrounded by two high‐velocity limbs of the flat slab (H2). Though many prior works detected the Pampean flat slab with strong heterogeneities, most of seismological studies focused on the seismic structure south of 29°S (e.g., Linkimer et al., 2020; Marot et al., 2014; Porter et al., 2012; Wagner et al., 2005), leaving an observational gap from 27°29°S. In this study, events and stations north of 27°S are included in the inversion, allowing us to resolve M1 and M2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the potential role of structural and sedimentological inheritance in controlling the style of foreland basin deformation must be considered when evaluating the effects of flat-subduction related deformation in Montana. In addition, the difference between the timing of deformation in Montana and the predicted temporal sweep from the margin inboard may provide insight into how lithospheric stress is transferred over long length scales along a dynamically variable plate margin as is seen in potentially analogous regions such as the flat-slab segment of the Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina (e.g., Linkimer et al, 2020).…”
Section: 1029/2020tc006193mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCA are one of the most seismically active regions along the South American convergent margin, where past seismic events had devastating impacts on humans, with loss of life and far‐reaching economic repercussions (Alvarado & Beck, 2006; Alvarado, Barrientos, et al., 2009; Ammirati et al., 2019; Gregori & Christiansen, 2018; Ruiz & Madariaga, 2018). So far, seismological research in the SCA focused on understanding the causative dynamics of the recorded seismicity within the oceanic plate and along the subduction interface (e.g., Anderson et al., 2007; Cloos & Shreve, 1996; Hackney et al., 2006; Linkimer et al., 2020; Moreno et al., 2010, 2014; Wagner et al., 2020; Weiss et al., 2019), while less attention has been paid to the mechanisms controlling upper‐plate seismicity (Alvarado et al., 2005; Alvarado, Barrientos, et al., 2009; Alvarado, Pardo, et al., 2009; Ammirati et al., 2019; Nacif et al., 2017; Smalley & Isacks, 1990; Smalley et al., 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%