2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015tc003935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithospheric structure of Central Europe: Puzzle pieces from Pannonian Basin to Trans‐European Suture Zone resolved by geophysical‐petrological modeling

Abstract: We have analyzed the thermochemical structure of the mantle in Central Europe, a complex area with a highly heterogeneous lithospheric structure reflecting the interplay of contraction, strike slip, subduction, and extension tectonics. Our modeling is based on an integrative 3‐D approach (LitMod) that combines in a self‐consistent manner concepts and data from thermodynamics, mineral physics, geochemistry, petrology, and solid Earth geophysics. This approach minimizes uncertainties of the estimates derived fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
(285 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the results obtained with the results of previous works (e.g., Zeyen et al, 2002;Grabowska and Bojdys, 2005;Dérerová et al, 2006;Grabovska et al, 2011;Grinč et al, 2013;Alasonati Tašarová et al, 2008, 2009, 2016 we can note that our results are in good agreement with the previous results. The results obtained in this paper extend our present information and knowledge significantly about the crustal and lower lithosphere densities of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing the results obtained with the results of previous works (e.g., Zeyen et al, 2002;Grabowska and Bojdys, 2005;Dérerová et al, 2006;Grabovska et al, 2011;Grinč et al, 2013;Alasonati Tašarová et al, 2008, 2009, 2016 we can note that our results are in good agreement with the previous results. The results obtained in this paper extend our present information and knowledge significantly about the crustal and lower lithosphere densities of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Table 2 and Figure 3 provide a range of average densities for the upper and lower crust, and lower lithosphere in the individual tectonic units. Figure 3 also shows the minimum and maximum depths for the depth of the sedimentary basement (Bielik, 1988;Kilényi andŠefara, 1989;Lenkey, 1999;Kováč, 2000;Bielik et al, 2005), the top and bottom boundaries of the upper and lower crust (Grad et al, 2006;Hrubcová et al, 2005;Środa et al, 2006;Janik et al, 2011), and the lower lithosphere (Zeyen et al, 2002;Dérerová et al, 2006;Grinč et al, 2013;Alasonati Tašárová et al, 2008, 2009, 2016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tibet (interpreted to be an eclogite, Razi et al, 2014 and references therein) or in the Superior Province (interpreted to be an anisotropic harzburgite, Musacchio et al, 2004). The eclogitic nature of the highvelocity upper mantle slice beneath TESZ was in fact postulated by Puziewicz (2006) and recently assumed in the models presented by Alasonati Tašárová et al (2016).…”
Section: Geological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region has been covered by extensive geophysical surveys, and an enormous amount of geological and geophysical data such as deep seismic reflection and refractions data (Mayerová et al, 1994;Tomek et al, 1989;Vozár andŠantavý, 1999), gravity data Alasonati Tašárová et al, 2009;Zahorec et al, 2013), surface heat flow data (Čermák et al, 1991;Majcin, 1993), geoelectric data (Putiška et al, 2012a,b), magnetotelluric data (Ádám, 1996) has been collected and is available for calculations and modelling in order to reconstruct the structure of the lithosphere and geodynamical and tectonic processes within it. Despite the fact that the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin area becomes very well explored and studied, the main focus still lays on the lithospheric structure reconstruction (Alasonati Tašárová et al, 2009, 2016Grinč et al, 2013;Hrubcová et al, 2010;Dérerová et al, 2006;Grad et al, 2006;Bielik et al, 2005 and many others). We believe that rheological modelling can provide additional information to already existing lithosperic models and contribute to better understanding of interactions among different tectonic units from rheological point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%