2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014tc003669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithospheric discontinuity structure in Alaska, thickness variations determined bySpreceiver functions

Abstract: We present the first broad-scale image of lithospheric thickness across the major tectonic domains of Alaska based on S wave receiver functions and joint interpretation with the potential field, seismic velocity, and heat flow measurements. Thus, we provide context for the distribution of strain throughout the Alaskan orocline. In the north, below the Brooks Range, a 130 km thick lithosphere is resolved, consistent with the presence of strong lithosphere that deflects strain to the south into central and south… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
42
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(209 reference statements)
15
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From south to north, our tomographic images show crustal velocities (<4.2 km/s) at deeper depths under the Wrangellia Composite Terrane south of the Denali fault that rapidly shallow under interior Alaska, gradually deepen under the Brooks Range before shallowing again under the North Slope (Figures c, c, and ). This crustal thickness pattern has been observed previously in 2‐D cross sections (e.g., Fuis et al, ) and a series of 1‐D crustal thickness estimates (e.g., Miller et al, ; O'Driscoll & Miller, ). Although we do not invert for a specific Moho model parameter, the addition of the receiver function data in the inversion constrains discontinuities better than surface wave inversions alone (Ward et al, , supporting information).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From south to north, our tomographic images show crustal velocities (<4.2 km/s) at deeper depths under the Wrangellia Composite Terrane south of the Denali fault that rapidly shallow under interior Alaska, gradually deepen under the Brooks Range before shallowing again under the North Slope (Figures c, c, and ). This crustal thickness pattern has been observed previously in 2‐D cross sections (e.g., Fuis et al, ) and a series of 1‐D crustal thickness estimates (e.g., Miller et al, ; O'Driscoll & Miller, ). Although we do not invert for a specific Moho model parameter, the addition of the receiver function data in the inversion constrains discontinuities better than surface wave inversions alone (Ward et al, , supporting information).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Figures and S19 show cross sections through the velocity structure of the DVG (Figure a) and the Aleutian island arc near Mount Spurr (Figure b). These indicate the slab and continental LAB locations, which are inferred from velocity discontinuities and agree with LAB picks from O'Driscoll and Miller () where the models overlap (Figure S21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The receiver function studies of O'Driscoll and Miller () and Bauer et al () have attempted to constrain the subduction geometry beneath Alaska by imaging velocity discontinuity structures. The S ‐ P receiver function model of O'Driscoll and Miller () does not resolve moderate‐to‐steeply dipping structures but reveals a flat Yakutat LAB at ~100‐km depth beneath south central Alaska and hints at the existence of a shallow slab beneath the WVF. The plane wave migration technique employed by Bauer et al () imaged dipping features and Yakutat crust ~80 km below the WVF; the extent of the slab north of the volcanoes was unconstrained, however.…”
Section: Previous Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, significant high‐ Vp anomalies are imaged under south central Alaska where intense mountain building is taking place due to the shallow subduction of the Yakutat slab (Figures a, d, and e; Eberhart‐Phillips et al, ; Ferris et al, ; Haynie & Jadamec, ; Jadamec et al, ; Koons et al, ; Mazzotti & Hyndman, ). In addition, a high‐ Vp anomaly is revealed beneath the western Brooks Range and Nulato Hills west of 150°W (Figures d–i), perhaps relevant to a thick lithosphere there (O'Driscoll & Miller, ).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%