2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gc005845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithospheric architecture beneath Hudson Bay

Abstract: Hudson Bay overlies some of the thickest Precambrian lithosphere on Earth, whose internal structures contain important clues to the earliest workings of plate formation. The terminal collision, the Trans-Hudson Orogen, brought together the Western Churchill craton to the northwest and the Superior craton to the southeast. These two Archean cratons along with the Paleo-Proterozoic Trans-Hudson internides, form the core of the North American craton. We use S to P converted wave imaging and absolute shear velocit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition of at least two temporally distinct lithospheric zones in our model endorses the idea that cratonic keel growth is not due to one particular dominant tectonic process and, most importantly, is not exclusively an Archean phenomenon. Previous seismic studies postulated a Paleoproterozoic origin for the lower layer beneath Hudson Bay and surrounding terranes [e.g., Darbyshire et al , ; Porritt et al , ], supporting episodic formation of cratonic roots in the Precambrian.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition of at least two temporally distinct lithospheric zones in our model endorses the idea that cratonic keel growth is not due to one particular dominant tectonic process and, most importantly, is not exclusively an Archean phenomenon. Previous seismic studies postulated a Paleoproterozoic origin for the lower layer beneath Hudson Bay and surrounding terranes [e.g., Darbyshire et al , ; Porritt et al , ], supporting episodic formation of cratonic roots in the Precambrian.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change may be distinguished by a change in anisotropic fast direction (e.g., Darbyshire et al, ; Liddell et al, ; Petrescu et al, ). Sharp discontinuities imaged at midlithospheric depths by receiver function studies throughout cratonic North America (Abt et al, ) and within northern Hudson Bay have supported this episodic growth theory (e.g., Porritt et al, ; Rychert & Shearer, ).…”
Section: Previous Geophysical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…King and Ritsema, 2000), in a chemically buoyant plume (e.g. Simmons et al, 2007;Dannberg and Sobolev, 2015), or due to thermal insulation beneath large continental plates (Andersen and King, 2014;Porritt et al, 2015). In contrast, kimberlite formation may additionally require excess T P (thermal plume) enabling upwelling mantle to be above the carbonated peridotite solidus over a large enough pressure interval to dissolve SiO 2 (Dasgupta, 2013), and/or enriched conditions (high CO 2 -H 2 O contents; section 4.1.3).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) helps explain the seismic complexity of cratonic lithospheric mantle and the occurrence of multiple, spatially distributed MLDs with both negative and positive velocity phases that appear only when short-period filtering is applied (Selway et al, 2015). A major argument in favour of MLDs being caused by processes dating back to cratonic lithosphere construction is that these discontinuities sometimes appear to be correlated with tectonic units and truncated at craton margins (Porritt et al, 2015). They show steep-sided seismic velocity offsets that therefore have persisted for billions of years (Poupinet al, 2003).…”
Section: Frozen Rock Fabrics: Mlds As Palaeo-labsmentioning
confidence: 99%