2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.850023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithology Classification and Porosity Estimation of Tight Gas Reservoirs With Well Logs Based on an Equivalent Multi-Component Model

Abstract: Tight gas makes up a significant portion of the natural gas resources. There are tight gas reservoirs with great reserve and economic potential in the west Sichuan Basin, China. Due to the complex mineral component and heterogeneity of the thick tight sand formations, the reservoir parameters are challenging to evaluate from well logs using conventional methods, even the fundamental porosity. The mineral components must be considered. In this study, based on the analysis of different logging responses of varyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They introduce LSTM-FCN, a hybrid model that outperforms conventional methods, and enhance it with particle swarm optimization. Also, these conventional well reports are used in other fields such as predicting porosity [15], permeability [16,17], and water saturation [18]. Among the methods discussed, utilizing well-logs proves to be a more prac-tical and cost-effective approach in the oil and gas industry compared to relying on seismic data and core images…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduce LSTM-FCN, a hybrid model that outperforms conventional methods, and enhance it with particle swarm optimization. Also, these conventional well reports are used in other fields such as predicting porosity [15], permeability [16,17], and water saturation [18]. Among the methods discussed, utilizing well-logs proves to be a more prac-tical and cost-effective approach in the oil and gas industry compared to relying on seismic data and core images…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%