“…Such a tendency was noted before between the older (Detroit and Meiji; 81-83 Ma) and younger (Nintoku, Daikakuji; 55-42 Ma) seamounts of the EHCS in the Pacific Ocean (Regelous et al, 2003) and between the older Kurai (600 Ma) and younger Katun (540 Ma) Paleoseamounts of the PAO . However, taking into account the average velocity of oceanic subduction and the growth of the oceanic lithosphere thickness (e.g., Parsons and Sclater, 1977;Reid and Jackson, 1981) the age difference between more depleted (transitional in our case) and enriched basalts erupted over one hot-spot and one oceanic plate, like in the EHCS, must be at least 30 Ma, i.e., approximately equal to the time interval between the Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician, which was estimated by micropaleontological data (Sennikov et al, 2003(Sennikov et al, , 2004. Therefore, for our interpretations we suggest that the older seamount could ne early Late Cambrian with an average age of 500 Ma and the younger seamount could ne Latest Cambrian to Early Ordovician with an average age of 470 Ma.…”