2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithological facies classification using deep convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was tested on a public data set also employed in [1,7,8] where each feature vector consists of seven measurements, namely gamma ray (GR), resistivity log (RL), photoelectric effect (PE), neutron-density porosity difference (DPHI), average neutron density porosity (PHIA), approximated as the root of the average fit (magenta), and the uncertainty of the result, corresponding to the typical accuracy prediction error, is estimated from the individual green least-squares approximations evaluated at N * draw (d). In this example the expected model accuracy is 73% and the estimate uncertainty is ±3% with 95% confidence (NOLAN, SHANKLE, SHRIMPLIN, NEWBY, CHURCH-MAN BIBLE, CROSS H CATTLE, KIMZEY A, LUKE G U and Recruit F9) were used for model training and evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method was tested on a public data set also employed in [1,7,8] where each feature vector consists of seven measurements, namely gamma ray (GR), resistivity log (RL), photoelectric effect (PE), neutron-density porosity difference (DPHI), average neutron density porosity (PHIA), approximated as the root of the average fit (magenta), and the uncertainty of the result, corresponding to the typical accuracy prediction error, is estimated from the individual green least-squares approximations evaluated at N * draw (d). In this example the expected model accuracy is 73% and the estimate uncertainty is ±3% with 95% confidence (NOLAN, SHANKLE, SHRIMPLIN, NEWBY, CHURCH-MAN BIBLE, CROSS H CATTLE, KIMZEY A, LUKE G U and Recruit F9) were used for model training and evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boosted trees approach dominated the top part of the leaderboard, with top eight scores all employing the method. A recent 1D-CNN model by Imamverdiyev and Sukhostat [8] deserves particular attention due to its relatively good performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitra et al [28] trained a CNN-based system to identify six species from microscope digital images and concluded that CNN architecture can provide the 'brain' for a viable robotic picking system. Imamverdiyev and Sukhostat [29] published an interesting geological application of CNN for lithofacies classification by employing different variables. Palafox et al [30] automatically detected geological landforms on Mars and they applied CNN successfully.…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Use Of Cnn In Geosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste trabalho foram obtidas taxas de precisão de 60 a 100 % dependendo da litologia analisada. Imamverdiyev et al (2019) [3] foi utilizada uma rede neural artificial profunda convolucional unidimensional (1D-CNN) para predizer a litologia. As variáveis de entrada foram o efeito fotoelétrico (PE), GR, registro de resistividade (RL), diferença de porosidade de densidade de nêutrons (DPHI), porosidade de densidade média de nêutrons (PHIA).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified