Lithologic and ground-water data for monitoring sites in the Mojave River and Warren Valley basins, San Bernardino County, California, 1992-1998

Huff, Julia A.; Clark, Dennis A.; Martin, Peter M.

doi:10.3133/ofr02354

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dissolved oxygen concentrations begin to decrease at this depth (Figure 3) and arsenic concentrations in this area may be controlled by geochemical factors, such as pH and redox at deeper depths, rather than geologic factors, such as the source of the alluvial deposits. Increasing arsenic concentrations with depth agrees with water-quality data for arsenic concentrations reported in Mojave River basin monitoring wells [6].…”

Section: Water-chemistry Datasupporting

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simulating Arsenic Mitigation Strategies in a Production Well

Goldrath¹,

Izbicki²

2015

J Geol Geophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Water-chemistry Datasupporting

confidence: 84%

“…Arid regions of the southwestern United States often depend on groundwater resources to supply rapidly growing populations. Arsenic is in water from some wells in the Mojave River basin in the western Mojave Desert of southern California at concentrations in excess of the MCL for arsenic [5][6][7][8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulating Arsenic Mitigation Strategies in a Production Well

Goldrath¹,

Izbicki²

2015

J Geol Geophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Optimal Pump and Recharge Management Model for Nitrate Removal in the Warren Groundwater Basin, California

Chiu

Nishikawa

Yeh

2010

J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction to study area hydrogeology, chromium sources, site history, and purpose of study

Izbicki¹,

Groover²,

Miller³

et al. 2023

Professional Paper

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) with input from a technical working group (TWG) composed of community members, the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the Independent Review Panel Manager (Project Navigator, Ltd.), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and consultants for PG&E. The study was funded cooperatively under an agreement between the Lahontan RWQCB and the USGS. Funding for the study was provided by PG&E to the Lahontan RWQCB. Logistical support for field work, including access to wells, was provided by PG&E. The TWG met approximately quarterly during the study to provide input to the study, and the Hinkley community was updated annually on study progress.The authors thank the many people involved in the design and implementation of this study including the staff of the Lahontan RWQCB, the staff of PG&E and their consultants, and the staff of Project Navigator, Ltd. The authors also acknowledge and thank the many involved community members who allowed access to their properties for sample collection, and who collectively donated thousands of hours on behalf of the local community in support of this project and for resolution of other issues related to anthropogenic hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), within the Hinkley area.

show abstract

Lithologic and ground-water data for monitoring sites in the Mojave River and Warren Valley basins, San Bernardino County, California, 1992-1998

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Simulating Arsenic Mitigation Strategies in a Production Well

Simulating Arsenic Mitigation Strategies in a Production Well

Optimal Pump and Recharge Management Model for Nitrate Removal in the Warren Groundwater Basin, California

Introduction to study area hydrogeology, chromium sources, site history, and purpose of study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About