2006
DOI: 10.1127/0078-0421/2005/0041-0211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithofazies und Leitflachen: Grundlagen einer dualen lithostratigraphischen Gliederung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term folgen has been used recently for unconformity-bounded units in the Triassic sequences of Germany (Lutz et al, 2005), with lithostratigraphic formations constituting parts of these (Nitsch, 2005).…”
Section: Allostratigraphic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term folgen has been used recently for unconformity-bounded units in the Triassic sequences of Germany (Lutz et al, 2005), with lithostratigraphic formations constituting parts of these (Nitsch, 2005).…”
Section: Allostratigraphic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the beds are developed as thin strata in the sense of allostratigraphy (Hallau Bed, Müsenegg Bed, Gipf Bed; cf. Lutz et al 2005). Namely the Hallau Bed (Planorbis to Liasicus zone), Schleitheim Bed (Angulata zone), Gächlingen Bed (Bucklandi zone), Trasadingen Bed (Davoei zone) and the Unterer Stein (Falcifer zone) have lithostratigraphic equivalents in southwestern Germany (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While revising the stratigraphy of the Early Jurassic strata in northern Switzerland, the joint subdivision of stratigraphic succesions into lithofacies units and quasi time units was used (see Lutz et al 2005 The new stratigraphic subdivision of the northern Swiss Early Jurassic strata is based on data from many different sources (see Table 1). The most significant and high quality data comes from the Klettgau area, Tabular Jura and the eastern Folded Jura.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), e.g. to cover correlative continuities of erosion events (following the concept of "dual lithostratigraphy" by Lutz et al 2005). Lithostratigraphical symbols follow the SEP 3 standards (Denino-Thiessen et al 2002, LGRB 2011.…”
Section: Lithostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphical Definitions Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%