2014
DOI: 10.1127/1860-1804/2014/0074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithofacies and depth dependency of thermo- and petrophysical rock parameters of the Upper Jurassic geothermal carbonate reservoirs of the Molasse Basin

Abstract: In the early stages of hydrothermal reservoir exploration, the thermo-physical characterization of the reservoir is accomplished by evaluating drilling data and seismic surveys. Especially in carbonate reservoirs the distinction of different facies zones and heterogeneities in general is very complex. For economic reasons a sufficiently high flow rate toward the production well and an according high fluid temperature is necessary. For reservoir predictions and modelling, geothermal parameters such as permeabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the spatial variation of the formation TC derived from well data, against laterally constant formation values, obviously reflects the natural heterogeneity of this parameter far better and is consistent with observations (cf. Norden and Förster, 2006;Schütz et al, 2012a,b;Homuth et al, 2014). In that respect, our results are generally consistent with results from Vogt et al (2010) and Mottaghy et al (2011).…”
Section: Differences Compared With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Considering the spatial variation of the formation TC derived from well data, against laterally constant formation values, obviously reflects the natural heterogeneity of this parameter far better and is consistent with observations (cf. Norden and Förster, 2006;Schütz et al, 2012a,b;Homuth et al, 2014). In that respect, our results are generally consistent with results from Vogt et al (2010) and Mottaghy et al (2011).…”
Section: Differences Compared With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Porosity and permeability are therefore the most important play properties to characterise and delineate geothermal plays hosting recoverable resources. The spatial variations of porosity and permeability are important to understand for sustainable geothermal reservoir operation (Homuth et al, 2014). They are linked to the geologic criteria used to group and characterise geothermal plays by structures such as faults and fractures or processes such as tectonism, compaction and diagenesis (Moeck, 2014).…”
Section: Crustal Permeability and Geothermal Play Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a better representation of the real geological situation could be achieved by implementing varying thermal properties laterally and with depth within a model unit. Recent studies (Homuth et al 2014(Homuth et al , 2015 on the nature and distribution of thermal properties of the Upper Jurassic could help reducing the uncertainties further. However, the findings for the long-wavelength thermal field of the Molasse Basin area and the thermal interdependence between the basin and the Alps are robust.…”
Section: Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%