2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium storage in conductive sulfur-containing polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with abundant resources and low cost, sulfur shows great potential as the cathode for the next generation of high-performance lithium batteries. Recently, it is reported that the sulfur composite prepared by the sulfurization of polyacrylonitrile shows good electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with abundant resources and low cost, sulfur shows great potential as the cathode for the next generation of high-performance lithium batteries. Recently, it is reported that the sulfur composite prepared by the sulfurization of polyacrylonitrile shows good electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, the double-plateau profiles disappeared after the first lithiation: this is due to the nanoscopic redistribution of sulfur/polysulfides that is a well-known phenomenon among S/PANbased composites (Wang et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2004;Fanous et al, 2011;Doan et al, 2013;Zhang, 2014).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…So far, S/PAN composites show relatively stable cycle life performance even in LiPF 6 /carbonate-based electrolyte solutions (note that any other composites cannot be used in LiPF 6 /carbonate-based electrolyte solutions because of irreversible polysulfides-carbonate reactions) (Wang et al, 2002(Wang et al, , 2003Yu et al, 2004;Fanous et al, 2011;Doan et al, 2013Doan et al, , 2014Zhang et al, 2013d,e;Konarov et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014;Zhang, 2014): it has been explained that the nanoscopic (or sub-nanoscopic) distribution of sulfur/polysulfides in cyclized PAN contributes to the polysulfide stabilization (Wang et al, 2002(Wang et al, , 2003Yu et al, 2004;Fanous et al, 2011;Doan et al, 2013;Zhang, 2014). S/PAN binary composites (Wang et al, 2002) or S/PAN/conducting carbon ternary composites (Wang et al, 2003) were first suggested by Wang et al Recently, S/PAN composites with nanosized additives, such as S/PAN/nanosized Mg 0.6 Ni 0.4 O (MNO) (Zhang et al, 2013d), S/PAN/graphene (Zhang et al, 2013e), and S/PAN/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) , were intensively investigated by the research groups of University of Waterloo (Canada) and Nazarbayev University (Kazakhstan), and it is likely that the use of nanosized filler (either conducting or non-conducting; conducting ones tend to show better rate performance, of course) can contribute to a better cycle life performance than the composites without nanosized fillers probably owing to the more homogeneous sulfur distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was reported that lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cells with liquid electrolytes had critical drawbacks in the aspects of cycle life, rate capability, and sulfur utilization [1][2][3][4]. Wang et al [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] reported that the sulfur composites, which were prepared by sulfurization of polyacrylonitrile with elemental sulfur, showed novel performances compared to elemental sulfur cathode and effectively overcame the problems occurring in sulfur electrodes. The sulfur composite presented high specific capacity over 800 mAh g −1 and excellent cycleability [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], showing that the sulfur composite was an alternative promising candidate cathode material for high-performance cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%