2020
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201909339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium‐Schwefel‐Batterien mit Magerelektrolyt: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven

Abstract: Energiespeicher finden als wichtige Transformationstechnologie zur kohlenstoffarmen Wirtschaft und nachhaltigen Energieversorgung große Beachtung. Außerordentlich vielversprechend ist hierbei die Lithium‐Schwefel‐Batterie aufgrund ihrer hohen theoretischen Energiedichte. Trotz immenser Fortschritte in den vergangenen Jahren liegt ihre tatsächliche Energiedichte jedoch noch weit unterhalb einer Praxistauglichkeit. Da die Elektrochemie des Schwefels stark von einer Fest/flüssig/fest‐Phasenumwandlung abhängt, spi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although researchers are beginning to recognize the significance of this metric, a large portion of Li-S research output still continues to use E/S ratios >20 mL mg À1 or simply neglects to report E/S ratio altogether. 1,[4][5][6] This fails to meet the standards of what is needed in order to realistically evaluate the improvements being reported. Therefore, to fairly gauge the improvements in cathode design and make relevant improvements to specific energy, the community must focus on reducing the E/S ratio below 5 mL mg À1 .…”
Section: Electrolyte-to-sulfur (E/s) Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers are beginning to recognize the significance of this metric, a large portion of Li-S research output still continues to use E/S ratios >20 mL mg À1 or simply neglects to report E/S ratio altogether. 1,[4][5][6] This fails to meet the standards of what is needed in order to realistically evaluate the improvements being reported. Therefore, to fairly gauge the improvements in cathode design and make relevant improvements to specific energy, the community must focus on reducing the E/S ratio below 5 mL mg À1 .…”
Section: Electrolyte-to-sulfur (E/s) Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, under the practical conditions of a high S loading (>5.0 mg cm −2 ), a low electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio (<3.0 µL mgs −1 ), and a limited Li anode (<50 µm), protecting lithium anode from the side reactions and inhibiting the growth of lithium dendrite are the key for pushing forward the further development of LSB. [330,331] So far, people have proposed a variety of strategies to achieve high-performance lithium metal anodes, including electrolyte modification [332,333] and binder design, forming an ion/electron conductor layer on Li-metal anode, [334] and preparing 3D conductive frameworks and lithiophilic hosts with sophisticated architectures. [288,335] The overall purpose is to enhance the stability of reaction interface and pursue uniform Li deposition to prevent the formation of lithium dendrites.…”
Section: Protect Lithium Anodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have become promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices due to their high specific capacity (1675 mAh g À1 ), high energy density (2600 Wh kg À1 ) and relatively lower cost compared to conventional Li-ion batteries based on transition metal oxide cathodes [1][2][3][4]. Unfortunately, the development of Li-S batteries is limited by many obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%