2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2738(02)00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium ion conduction in lithium magnesium thio-phosphate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P atoms reside mostly in the layer containing Sc, while the layer containing lithium mostly contains vacancies on the respective P position. This distribution of the P 2 dumbells is reflected by the site occupation factors of SOF(P1) = 0.925 and SOF(P2) = 1 – SOF(P1), which agrees well with the site distribution found in Li 4–2 x Mg x P 2 S 6 ( x = 2/3) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The P atoms reside mostly in the layer containing Sc, while the layer containing lithium mostly contains vacancies on the respective P position. This distribution of the P 2 dumbells is reflected by the site occupation factors of SOF(P1) = 0.925 and SOF(P2) = 1 – SOF(P1), which agrees well with the site distribution found in Li 4–2 x Mg x P 2 S 6 ( x = 2/3) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These bond lengths are in good agreement with the isostructural Li 2 FeP 2 S 6 and other related A ScP 2 S 6 compounds ( A = Ag, Na) , . The Li‐ion conductivity of Li 4 P 2 S 6 , was previously measured to be very low (see Table ) but it increases with increasing magnesium content x in the range of x ≤ 2/3 (see Table ); beyond that value it decreases again . Therefore, we suspected that Li 4–3 x Sc x P 2 S 6 could show enhanced Li ion conductivity, compared to the parent compound Li 4 P 2 S 6 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations