2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.174301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium diffusion in the spinel phaseLi4Ti5O12and in the rocksalt phaseet al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower one is set as reference.to find out the most favorable arrangement of Li and Ti atoms at the 16d sites to obtain a reasonable bulk model. In the most stable configuration, the two Li 16d atoms have the largest distances and a layer at c/2 of the supercell is occupied by Li atoms only, that shows a similar atom arrangement in other reported structures 42,43. Figure 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The lower one is set as reference.to find out the most favorable arrangement of Li and Ti atoms at the 16d sites to obtain a reasonable bulk model. In the most stable configuration, the two Li 16d atoms have the largest distances and a layer at c/2 of the supercell is occupied by Li atoms only, that shows a similar atom arrangement in other reported structures 42,43. Figure 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Some potential reasons for symmetry breaking in our system are: (i) the manufacturing process leads to a Pt bottom electrode that has been exposed to higher temperatures, while the Pt top electrode is deposited at room temperature; (ii) in similar spinel systems it has been shown that a Li‐rich nanometric layer is generated during film preparation, which can cause a thermodynamically favorable state where one of the phases wet the Pt electrode. (iii) the 16d positions are randomly populated by Ti and Li ions with a ratio 5:1, and this is known to affect Li‐ion pathways in the bulk . The latter is further supported by Atomic Force Microscopy measurements, in which topography and phase maps show clear contrast between grains, Figure S7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As noted above, this subtle difference in the permittivity can explain the different hysteretic behavior between the measured current‐voltage curves, Figure a‐b, for Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 , respectively. The difference in retention can be explained in terms of Li‐diffusivity of the phase‐separated filament, e.g., the Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 filaments created in the Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 device would tend to lower retention values, given the higher diffusivity of Li‐ions in the Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 phase . However, at this stage, the size and composition of the filaments remains as an open question, which should be unveiled by advanced characterization techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the interface between the LTO and liquid electrolyte at 1.5 V vs. Li/Li + , there is no electrolyte reduction reaction and therefore no SEI is formed on LTO at 1. 29 With no SEI and fast Li + conduction in LTO, the Li + de-solvation process is a rate limiting step at the LTO and electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%