2018
DOI: 10.4467/21995923fq.18.001.9819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithic analysis of the Middle and Late Upper Palaeolithic in Hungary

Abstract: A b s t r a c t. This paper presents lithic technology studies on the Middle and Late period of the Upper Palaeolithic in hungary between 26 and 13 ka BP. The studies aimed at describing and then comparing the technological processes from lithic raw material procurement to the formal tool making. An attempt was made to find correlations between technological features and chronological positions of the assemblages to see if lithic technology operated traditionally or opportunistically. The study found that tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
51
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The dates from the lower layer complex, between 30.0 and 28.5 ka cal BP, are older than the age estimated by the biostratigraphy (Dobosi and Vörös 1987;Dobosi and Szántó 2003). These ages are in agreement with the Late Gravettian cultural affiliation (Lengyel 2016).…”
Section: Pilisszántó Isupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dates from the lower layer complex, between 30.0 and 28.5 ka cal BP, are older than the age estimated by the biostratigraphy (Dobosi and Vörös 1987;Dobosi and Szántó 2003). These ages are in agreement with the Late Gravettian cultural affiliation (Lengyel 2016).…”
Section: Pilisszántó Isupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In ECE, most of the Epigravettian sites were found in the Carpathian Basin (CB), especially in Hungary (Lengyel, 2018;Lengyel and Wilczyński, 2018). The Hungarian research previously recognized two chronological clusters of Epigravettian: (1) late LGM sites between 18 and and 16 ka uncal BP (Dobosi, 2000) featuring an expedient lithic technology (Dobosi, 2004(Dobosi, , 2009, and (2) post LGM sites between 16 and 12 ka uncal BP called "Epigravettian rich in blunted blades" (Dobosi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traces of Magdalenian origin are completely absent there, and instead, Epigravettian settlements are present, e.g. at Moravany-Żakovska and Lopata (Hromada and Kozłowski 1995;Kazior et al 1998), Sagvar (Lengyel 2016), but these sites do not show strong settlement dynamics and are very dispersed over time.…”
Section: Post-lgm Hunter-gatherers In Sub-carpathian Europementioning
confidence: 99%