2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature review of deteriorating inventory models by key topics from 2012 to 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 273 publications
2
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with (9) and (11), (12) can be employed to obtain as the optimal solution to (13): * = max .…”
Section: Optimal Solution Of Model (9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with (9) and (11), (12) can be employed to obtain as the optimal solution to (13): * = max .…”
Section: Optimal Solution Of Model (9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reviews published from 2011 to 2016 have treated 2 Journal of Food Quality fresh (or perishable) goods as a distinct classification and examined relevant research. For detailed literature reviews on the inventory model for deteriorating items, see Nahmias [9], Karaesmen et al [10], Bakker et al [11], and Janssen et al [12]. This study avoided repeating these previous works and instead focused on a deeper exploration of the problems involved in fresh goods inventories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined EOQ and suggested optimal solution by considering demand rate as constant in first part of the cycle and linear increasing in the other part. The literature surveys by Nahmias [11], Raafat [12], Goyal and Giri [13], Li et al [14], Bakker et al [15] and Janssen et al [16] cite up-to-date review of the advances made in the field of deteriorating inventory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singhal and Singh (2015) optimized total cost by considering multi variate demand and permitting shortages partially. More detailed reviews are given by Goyal and Giri, (2001), Bakker et al (2012), Khanlarzade et al (2014) and Janssen et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%