The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature 2010
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521855594.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literature of the early Ming to mid-Ming (1375–1572)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 165 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four masters, known as Wŏl Sang Kye T’aek 月象谿澤 by the initials of their pen names, are renowned for their elegant prose in the Tang-Song neoclassical mode. However, Yi Chŏnggwi and Yi Sik have been suspected of being influenced by a contemporary literary trend that became fashionable in Beijing: archaism (Korean pokko /Chinese fugu 復古) or Old Phraseology (Korean komunsa /Chinese guwenci 古文辭) (Bryant, 2008; Chang, 2010, pp. 28-36; Rho, 2015; Ong, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four masters, known as Wŏl Sang Kye T’aek 月象谿澤 by the initials of their pen names, are renowned for their elegant prose in the Tang-Song neoclassical mode. However, Yi Chŏnggwi and Yi Sik have been suspected of being influenced by a contemporary literary trend that became fashionable in Beijing: archaism (Korean pokko /Chinese fugu 復古) or Old Phraseology (Korean komunsa /Chinese guwenci 古文辭) (Bryant, 2008; Chang, 2010, pp. 28-36; Rho, 2015; Ong, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%