their theoretical purism. However, together we do argue that Golding's novel is the perfect test case for both unnatural and the current second-generation cognitive narratology (on the latter, see the introduction to this special issue) and that the consequences for both paradigms are more complex than one might readily assume. Our joint effort culminates in a new allegorical reading of The Inheritors that associates the Neanderthal mind and experience as imagined by Golding with the cognitive peculiarities of reading fiction. Closer attention to the dynamics between perception, embodiment, style, and ethics, we argue, will produce a more workable model of strange and difficult focalization and narration than holistically applied, macroframing unnaturalist or enactivist approaches would accomplish alone. Focalization: Enactivist, Unnatural, Animal, Neanderthal? Cognitivist: Golding's novel famously begins with an epigraph in which H. G. Wells describes the "repulsive strangeness" of the Neanderthal man. The story that follows of Lok, Fa, Liku, and the rest of their small tribe has conventionally been read as an antithesis to the brutish and dehumanizing nineteenth-century view expressed in Wells's description. Golding's sympathetic presentation comes across clearly in, for example, this passage from The Inheritors, describing the Neanderthals out looking for food: They padded down among the rocks and bushes. All at once the sun was through, a round of dulled silver, racing slantwise through the clouds yet always staying in the same place. Lok went first, then Liku, serious and eager on this her first proper food hunt. The slope eased and they reached the cliff-like border that gave on to the heathery sea of the plain. Lok poised and the others stilled behind him. He turned, looked a question at Fa, then raised his head again. He blew out air through his nose suddenly, then breathed in. Delicately he sampled this air, drawing a stream into his nostrils and allowing it to remain