2016
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316423202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Literary Coteries and the Making of Modern Print Culture

Abstract: Literary Coteries and the Making of Modern Print Culture, 1740-1790 offers the first study of manuscript-producing coteries as an integral element of eighteenth-century Britain's literary culture. As a corrective to literary histories assuming that the dominance of print meant the demise of a vital scribal culture, the book profiles four interrelated and influential coteries, focusing on each group's deployment of traditional scribal practices, on key individuals who served as bridges between networks, and on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other women poets deliberately chose to eschew print in favour of sociable manuscript production. Whelan's (2011Whelan's ( , 2015 research into nonconformist women's poetry-alongside broader literary studies by Bigold (2013), Schellenberg (2016) and Williams (2017)-demonstrates that many women writers (and their male friends) habitually composed manuscript verse for artistic experimentation, personal fulfilment, and to entertain and expand their social networks. Informative models for locating and interpreting women's manuscript poetry have emerged (e.g., Londry, 2004a;Runge, 2006), which convey just how much archival material remains unstudied, whilst highlighting that women's poetic activities extended beyond authorship to include acts of 'collecting, selecting, transcribing, editing, juxtaposing, endorsing and exchanging poems' (Hackett, 2013, p. 131).…”
Section: Surveying Recent Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other women poets deliberately chose to eschew print in favour of sociable manuscript production. Whelan's (2011Whelan's ( , 2015 research into nonconformist women's poetry-alongside broader literary studies by Bigold (2013), Schellenberg (2016) and Williams (2017)-demonstrates that many women writers (and their male friends) habitually composed manuscript verse for artistic experimentation, personal fulfilment, and to entertain and expand their social networks. Informative models for locating and interpreting women's manuscript poetry have emerged (e.g., Londry, 2004a;Runge, 2006), which convey just how much archival material remains unstudied, whilst highlighting that women's poetic activities extended beyond authorship to include acts of 'collecting, selecting, transcribing, editing, juxtaposing, endorsing and exchanging poems' (Hackett, 2013, p. 131).…”
Section: Surveying Recent Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Betty Schellenberg and James Woolley have both emphasized the importance of manuscript culture to the eighteenth century, specifically in relation to the literary and cultural work of coteries (including the Bluestockings) and to our studies of Swift, respectively. 6 An engagement with manuscript material is also obviously important as we push beyond canonical figures: Andrew Carpenter's edition of the manuscript poems of Olivia Elder offers a recent example, as does Vincent Morley's full-length study of Irish-language poetry in the eighteenth century. 7 The ternary nexus of print, manuscript, and oral modes has thus far focused almost exclusively in our period on studies of theater and song, particularly of ballads: articles by Paula McDowell and Ruth Perry on Scottish and English ballads exemplify this interest.…”
Section: Print Manuscript and Oral Literarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on archival sources, I examine the social process of the poem's creation in the light of new work on literary sociability, particularly Betty Schellenberg's recognition 'that for […] successful professionals, one of their principal investments of time and social capital, and seemingly one of their sources of greatest pride, was in their active membership in a literary coterie', which she defines as 'a select group of individuals linked by ties of friendship founded upon, or deepened by, mutual encouragement to original composition; the production and exchange of manuscript materials to celebrate the group and further its members' interests; and the criticism of one another's work and of shared reading materials'. 11 Astronomy existed for at least a decade as an unstable text within what Hilary Havens terms 'an intricate series of networks' familial, literary, scientific and aristocratic. 12 Late Georgian literary culture, Tim Fulford claims, 'was undergoing a series of rapid transformations that altered the status and role of authors', so that 'a capitalized publishing market served an expanded reading public and scores of new newspapers, journals and magazines traded in the personalwhether by hostile reviews that attacked an author's private character, or by gossip about literary celebrities'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 That Burney's steady progress from bound apprentice to man of letters was due to charm as well as talent and energy, he acknowledged late in life: 'I may be said to have been in the great world ever since I went first to Wilbury with M r Greville w ch is now near 60 years -& though only a Musician, I was never Sent to the 2 d table'. 15 Schellenberg notes that 'eighteenth-century coteries […] became the means by which middling men and women were enabled to cross class barriers through the personal connections forged by correspondence and literary exchange', 16 a process embodied by Burney, whom astronomy assisted in transcending barriers. His social status was middling, his income precarious, his friendships necessarily transactional.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation