Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listwise Collaborative Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pair-wise methods (e.g., BPR [5]), learn binary classifiers that compare ordered pairs of items to decide whether the first item is preferred to the second. The applicability of such methods is limited by the high computational cost of pair-wise comparisons of userrated items in generating the training samples for the binary classifiers [6]. List-wise methods leverage the entire list of items consumed by the users to optimize a list-wise ranking loss function or the probability of permutations that map items to ranks [7], [8].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pair-wise methods (e.g., BPR [5]), learn binary classifiers that compare ordered pairs of items to decide whether the first item is preferred to the second. The applicability of such methods is limited by the high computational cost of pair-wise comparisons of userrated items in generating the training samples for the binary classifiers [6]. List-wise methods leverage the entire list of items consumed by the users to optimize a list-wise ranking loss function or the probability of permutations that map items to ranks [7], [8].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They usually obtain the user similarity matrix based on the whole item lists instead of the item pairs. For instance, ListCF [13] adopts a permutation probability model and takes the divergence between two users' probability distributions as their similarity.…”
Section: Memory-based Methods For Top-n Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of typical pairwise approaches in collaborative filtering is Bayesian personalized ranking (BPR) [11] adopted in our coarse-to-fine transfer learning framework. As for listwise approaches [13], the distance or divergence between the predicted item list and the true item list is to be minimized. In addition to standard CF algorithms above, some other works integrate various CF approaches in order to achieve a much better performance, e.g., transfer to rank (ToR) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weimer et al [18] proposed an algorithm called CoFiRank which directly optimized the evaluation criteria NDCG. Huang et al [19] directly predicted a total order of items for each user based on similar users' probability distributions over permutations of the items.…”
Section: Ltr-based Cf Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%