2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijqss-02-2019-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening to the voice of students, developing a service quality measuring and evaluating framework for a special course

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a service quality measuring and evaluating framework for courses that are not part of the regular end-of-semester course evaluation system because of their special characteristics. The results of an academic year-long application are also to be demonstrated. Design/methodology/approach Based on the SERVQUAL methodology and specific models proposed in the literature, altogether 26 statements related to project works were formulated, in case of which, students ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the report between Feb-June (TEC, 2020a) shows that the institution have invested over 82,483 h in the monitoring of the teaching of the model, with over 135,828 online sessions facilitated by the teachers covering over 3,480,568 students during this period, which in the same vein, may explain the learning progression of the students as observed in the results of the data analysis in this study. More importantly this shows the implication of the innovative models and students' choices under the current circumstances and formative experiences for the educators in terms of future learning management and strategies (Nagel et al, 2020;Tóth & Surman, 2019). Besides, we note from the MFD Experience and Emotion Survey analysis that only 18% of the students required extra support with their learning and well-being during this period.…”
Section: Hyflex + Tec Hybrid Learning Mode (Post-covid)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Recently, the report between Feb-June (TEC, 2020a) shows that the institution have invested over 82,483 h in the monitoring of the teaching of the model, with over 135,828 online sessions facilitated by the teachers covering over 3,480,568 students during this period, which in the same vein, may explain the learning progression of the students as observed in the results of the data analysis in this study. More importantly this shows the implication of the innovative models and students' choices under the current circumstances and formative experiences for the educators in terms of future learning management and strategies (Nagel et al, 2020;Tóth & Surman, 2019). Besides, we note from the MFD Experience and Emotion Survey analysis that only 18% of the students required extra support with their learning and well-being during this period.…”
Section: Hyflex + Tec Hybrid Learning Mode (Post-covid)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, Bitner and Hubbert (1994) point out that satisfaction could also be considered at the individual transaction or encounter level. In alignment with that, there are also models which focus on the lower levels of institutional operation which characterize these service encounter level interactions (Noaman et al , 2017; Yousapronpaiboon, 2014; Sadeh and Garkaz, 2015; Kincsesné et al , 2015; Tóth and Surman, 2019). On the transaction level students are the participants who directly receive and use the services offered by the lecturers which makes them priority customers of educational services (Marzo-Navarro et al , 2005; Sander et al , 2000; Hill, 1995).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the study also believes that by efficiently using the extracted information or results of the two methods (Text mining and Machine learning) correctly, the higher educational institutions or educationalists can define adequate teaching analytical methods or innovative technologies that can not only be used to support the effectiveness of the teaching–learning processes in general, but can also be utilized to maintain a strong relationship amongst the stakeholders (e.g., HEIs, teachers, students) (Ndukwe & Daniel, 2020 ; Payne, 2006 ; Piedade & Santos, 2010 ; Renz & Hilbig, 2020 ; Tseng et al, 2018 ). Therefore, in theory, the resultant model (EPDM + ML) and methodological approach used in this study shows to be important towards the promotion and advancement of the stakeholders´ experiences and/or teaching–learning performances/outcomes at large (Bowdre, 2020 ; De Fortuny et al, 2013 ; Dollinger & Lodge, 2018 ; Er et al, 2019 ; Gomes & Ma, 2020 ; Hilliger et al, 2020 ; Pedró et al, 2019 ; Sánchez et al, 2019 ; Tóth & Surman, 2019 ; Yadav & Berges, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%