2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-019-09563-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening to migrant workers: should Canada’s Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program be abolished?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work must, however, be done with careful attention to what workers say they want and need and to available opportunities and constraints. As argued recently by Weiler and McLaughlin, 47 for instance, despite the threats to rights, freedom, dignity, and voice associated with Canada’s TFW programs, abolition rather than reform of these programs in the context of wider social justice initiatives is not the best way to strengthen the rights of these workers. Many, but by no means all, international migrant workers want to move to the host country; access to permanent residency will not, in and of itself, eliminate the OHS and other vulnerabilities of these workers and the right to mobility for work is essential to their health and well-being and that of their families, particularly in the context of economic volatility and precarious employment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work must, however, be done with careful attention to what workers say they want and need and to available opportunities and constraints. As argued recently by Weiler and McLaughlin, 47 for instance, despite the threats to rights, freedom, dignity, and voice associated with Canada’s TFW programs, abolition rather than reform of these programs in the context of wider social justice initiatives is not the best way to strengthen the rights of these workers. Many, but by no means all, international migrant workers want to move to the host country; access to permanent residency will not, in and of itself, eliminate the OHS and other vulnerabilities of these workers and the right to mobility for work is essential to their health and well-being and that of their families, particularly in the context of economic volatility and precarious employment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work must, however, be done with careful attention to what workers say they want and need and to available opportunities and constraints. As argued recently by Weiler and McLaughlin, 47 for instance, despite the threats to rights, freedom, dignity and voice associated with Canada's temporary foreign worker programs, abolition rather than reform of these programs in the context of wider social justice initiatives is not the best way to strengthen the rights of these workers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if granted open work permits and thus permitted to change employment, migrant workers would feel less vulnerable to the arbitrariness and pressures at work and may be in a better position to demand respect and develop attachments to their workplaces. Demands for open work permits and/or permanent residency (on arrival or as a two‐step pathway) have been advocated by researchers and activists such as UFCW, Migrant Rights Network, and Justicia for Migrant Worker (see, for instance, Weiler & McLaughlin, 2019; UFCW, 2020, migrantrights.ca; https://harvestingfreedom.org/ ). These demands are articulated from the perspectives that foreground migrant rights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focused on worker dependency, this extensive body of research points to the risks generated when residency is tied to employment (Bakan et al 1997; Craig et al, 2015; Goldring & Landolt, 2013; Hennebry 2012; Hodge, 2006; McLaughlin & Hennebry, 2013; Nakache & Dixon‐Perera, 2015; Tungohan 2015; Walia, 2010). Such a requirement, it is argued, leaves workers extremely vulnerable to a range of abusive practices, including wage‐left, dangerous working conditions and extortionate rental rates (Bucklaschuk, 2014; Fudge, 2014; Hennebry, McLaughlin & Preibisch, 2016; Horgan & Liinamaa, 2017; Perry, 2012; Weiler & McLaughlin, 2019).…”
Section: Mobile Workers: Mobile Filipino Labour Navigates Tim Horton Globallymentioning
confidence: 99%