1984
DOI: 10.1080/23808985.1984.11678576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Listening Behavior: Definition and Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of definitions of listening have been reported in the literature since 1929 (see Nichols, 1947;Rankin, 1929;Watson & Barker, 1984;Wolvin & Coakley, 1992). A few components in listening definitions include: analyzing, understanding, converting meaning to mind, interpreting, assimilating, comprehending, selecting attending, sensing, evaluating, empathizing and organizing (Wolvin & Coakley, 1992, p. 72).…”
Section: Listeningmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of definitions of listening have been reported in the literature since 1929 (see Nichols, 1947;Rankin, 1929;Watson & Barker, 1984;Wolvin & Coakley, 1992). A few components in listening definitions include: analyzing, understanding, converting meaning to mind, interpreting, assimilating, comprehending, selecting attending, sensing, evaluating, empathizing and organizing (Wolvin & Coakley, 1992, p. 72).…”
Section: Listeningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While often viewed as a component of communication competence, listening has been the focus of considerable research (Watson & Barker, 1984;Wolvin & Coakley, 1992). A number of definitions of listening have been reported in the literature since 1929 (see Nichols, 1947;Rankin, 1929;Watson & Barker, 1984;Wolvin & Coakley, 1992).…”
Section: Listeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 Maintain attention to oral messages 0 Select significant messages while exposed to competing stimuli Process oral language style as compared to written style Process a variety of oral presentation modes Use non-verbal context in processing messages Engage in self-monitoring the accuracy of comprehension Reviewing the instruments for assessing listening (Brown & Carlson, 1955;Watson & Barker, 1984;Rubin & Roberts, 1987;Lieb-Brilhart, 1965;and Bostrom, 1990), Daly (1992) Further, to accomplish such assessment, Mead and Rubin (1985) recommend that all listening tests must be designed to (1) represent typical oral language; (2) model the language heardin typical situations;…”
Section: Subgoalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argued that previous listening tests had simply been measuring aspects of intelligence. Weaver (1972, p. 12) took Kelly's ideas into consideration and defined listening as &dquo;the selection and retention of aurally received data.&dquo; Following Weaver's lead there were numerous attempts to broaden the definition of listening, but most listening research continued to use the lecture-retention model (Watson & Barker, 1984). Bostrom (1988, p. 4) challenged: &dquo;if this activity is wholly dependent upon intelligence, as we would conclude from Kelly's data, the use of lecture-retention as a dependent variable in listening research cannot be defended.&dquo; The conclusion, however, is that listening is not wholly dependent upon intelligence, it has come to be seen as a series of related skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%