2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2006.254928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

List Sequential MIMO Detection: Noise Bias Term and Partial Path Augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of an MAlgorithm/ITS based detector [13] with the same maximum number of node extensions is plotted as reference (stack size M = 11, e IT S = 1 + (M T − 1) · M = 34). 6 6.5 For the ZF-based LISS, the best performance is achieved when using the noise bias as length term. For the MMSE case, the LISS using a Babai bias again outperforms the LISS employing the noise bias.…”
Section: B 16-qam Results Liss With Bounded Complexitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of an MAlgorithm/ITS based detector [13] with the same maximum number of node extensions is plotted as reference (stack size M = 11, e IT S = 1 + (M T − 1) · M = 34). 6 6.5 For the ZF-based LISS, the best performance is achieved when using the noise bias as length term. For the MMSE case, the LISS using a Babai bias again outperforms the LISS employing the noise bias.…”
Section: B 16-qam Results Liss With Bounded Complexitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Again, the noise bias provides the best performance-complexity trade-off in the ZF case while in the MMSE case the Babai bias should be used. 6 6.5 The lower performance of the ZF-based LISS using the Babai bias is due to the fact that the search tree is centered on the ZF-Babai solution in this case, while when using the noise bias it is still centered on the ML solution (only an estimate for the metric accumulated by the ML path is subtracted from the metrics). The relevance of centering the tree search on the ML solution has been stressed in [14] in the context of sphere decoding, and we observe the same behavior here in the context of list sequential detection.…”
Section: B 16-qam Results Liss With Bounded Complexitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By using an appropriate value for (such as through empirical simulations), we can achieve substantial reduction in back-tracking operations with negligible performance loss. A similar approach has been applied to the SD algorithm in [17] and to SA in [36]. Our approach differs from that of [36] in that rather than using the expected noise power to obtain a bias term, we employ a probabilistic condition (34) to choose .…”
Section: Closest-list Stack Algorithm ( -Lsa)mentioning
confidence: 97%