List of publications on the economic and social history of Great Britain and Ireland published in 2018

Hale, Matthew; Raymond, Graham; Wright, Catherine

doi:10.1111/ehr.12911

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 1,217 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A similar project in cancer biology is ongoing. 41 The Many Labs project sought to reproduce 13 effects found in the literature, testing them in 36 samples with a total sample size of 6,344, and determining whether online samples produced different effects than lab samples, and also comparing international to US samples. They find that two types of interventions failed to replicate entirely, while results for other replications relative to the original studies were more nuanced.…”

Section: Open Data and Materials And Their Use For Replicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bartling et al, AER 2012 (35) Charness and Dufwenberg, AER 2011 (36) Chen and Chen, AER 2011 (37) de Clippel et al, AER 2014 (38) Duffy and Puzzello, AER 2014 (39) Dulleck et al, AER 2011 (40) Ericson and Fuster, QJE 2011 (41) Fehr et al, AER 2013 (42) Friedman and Oprea, AER 2012 (43) Fudenberg et al, AER 2012 44Huck et al, AER 2011 (45) lfcher and Zarghamee, AER 2011 (46) Kessler and Roth, AER 2012 47Kirchler et al, AER 2012 48Kogan et al, AER 2011 (49) Kuziemko et al, QJE 2014 50British Medical Journal 340: C950. Longhi, Simonetta, Peter Nijkamp, and Jacques Poot.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

Christensen

Miguel

2018

Journal of Economic Literature

288

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:There is growing interest in enhancing research transparency and reproducibility in economics and other scientific fields. We survey existing work on these topics within economics, and discuss the evidence suggesting that publication bias, inability to replicate, and specification searching remain widespread in the discipline. We next discuss recent progress in this area, including through improved research design, study registration and pre-analysis plans, disclosure standards, and open sharing of data and materials, drawing on experiences in both economics and other social sciences. We discuss areas where consensus is emerging on new practices, as well as approaches that remain controversial, and speculate about the most effective ways to make economics research more credible in the future. 1 We thank the editor Steven Durlauf and four anonymous referees for useful comments.

show abstract

Section: Open Data and Materials And Their Use For Replicationmentioning

confidence: 99%