2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06304-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LISA improves statistical analysis for fMRI

Abstract: One of the principal goals in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the detection of local activation in the human brain. However, lack of statistical power and inflated false positive rates have recently been identified as major problems in this regard. Here, we propose a non-parametric and threshold-free framework called LISA to address this demand. It uses a non-linear filter for incorporating spatial context without sacrificing spatial precision. Multiple comparison correction is achieved by cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include steerable filters (Knutsson et al, 1983), which enable directionally-adaptive spatial smoothing (Friman et al, 2003;Eklund et al, 2011;Zhuang et al, 2017;Abramian et al, 2020b), wavelet transforms (Mallat, 1989;Bullmore et al, 2004), which try to strike a balance between localization in space and frequency domain (Ruttimann et al, 1998;Van De Ville et al, 2004;Breakspear et al, 2006), and non-linear filters (e.g. bilateral filters) that locally adapt to various features of adjacent voxels (Smith and Brady, 1997;Rydell et al, 2008;Lohmann et al, 2018). While such methods have been successfully applied to GM, their adaptive properties rely on the spatial features manifested by the BOLD contrast.…”
Section: Spatial Smoothing Tailored To Fmri Data In White Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include steerable filters (Knutsson et al, 1983), which enable directionally-adaptive spatial smoothing (Friman et al, 2003;Eklund et al, 2011;Zhuang et al, 2017;Abramian et al, 2020b), wavelet transforms (Mallat, 1989;Bullmore et al, 2004), which try to strike a balance between localization in space and frequency domain (Ruttimann et al, 1998;Van De Ville et al, 2004;Breakspear et al, 2006), and non-linear filters (e.g. bilateral filters) that locally adapt to various features of adjacent voxels (Smith and Brady, 1997;Rydell et al, 2008;Lohmann et al, 2018). While such methods have been successfully applied to GM, their adaptive properties rely on the spatial features manifested by the BOLD contrast.…”
Section: Spatial Smoothing Tailored To Fmri Data In White Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of any DW-MRI data, it would be possible to adapt the proposed method to use a structure tensor representation (Knutsson, 1989) derived from T1-weighted MRI images as the complementary contrast (Abramian et al, 2020b), wherein the proposed filtering scheme could be extended to function across the entire brain mask. The resulting morphology-based spatial smoothing could then be seen as a GSP-based alternative to non-linear filtering algorithms which enable spatial smoothing within similar anatomical compartments (Smith and Brady, 1997;Weickert and Scharr, 2002;Ding et al, 2005;Rydell et al, 2008;Lohmann et al, 2018), but will not provide adaptation to WM fiber orientations.…”
Section: Outlook; Potential Extensions and Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each voxel within the mask, we correlated single-participant behavioural predictability gain and neural parameter estimates across conditions, using a custom Matlab script. After applying Fisher’s z-transformation to all Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, single-participant maps were submitted to the Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) group-level one-sample t -test (Lohmann et al 2018). LISA is a threshold-free framework that allows to find consistent effects in small brain regions by applying a non-linear filter to statistical maps before controlling for multiple comparisons at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this form of intracortical smoothing requires accurate knowledge of the local layer geometry within the cortex, there are alternative approaches to apply layer-specific smoothing in preferred layer-directions without the need to have pre-defined layer labels available. For example, it has been suggested to apply intracortical non-isotropic smoothing based on the local functional activation (Lohmann et al 2018;Smith and Brady 1997) or based on the non-isotropic MRI signal intensity across the cortical depth. In LayNii, this form of smoothing is implemented in the program LN_GRADSMOOTH by taking advantage of the fact that highresolution EPI intensities contain informative anatomical information too.…”
Section: Layer-specific Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%