2014
DOI: 10.4236/pp.2014.54040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liraglutide vs Exenatide: Patient Adherence, Medication Persistence and Economic Evaluation in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[106] In a 12-month follow-up study of treatment adherence, proportion of days covered (PDC) was 71.0% and medication possession ratio (MPR) was 76.0% in patients with T2DM ( N = 881) receiving canagliflozin. The corresponding median PDC was 83.0% and MPR value was 88.0%, indicating good treatment adherence with canagliflozin 300 mg.[107] Furthermore, persistence with AHAs is an important predictor of outcomes in these patients.…”
Section: Treatment Adherence and Persistence Of Canagliflozin 300 Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[106] In a 12-month follow-up study of treatment adherence, proportion of days covered (PDC) was 71.0% and medication possession ratio (MPR) was 76.0% in patients with T2DM ( N = 881) receiving canagliflozin. The corresponding median PDC was 83.0% and MPR value was 88.0%, indicating good treatment adherence with canagliflozin 300 mg.[107] Furthermore, persistence with AHAs is an important predictor of outcomes in these patients.…”
Section: Treatment Adherence and Persistence Of Canagliflozin 300 Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%