2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidity risk and cross-sectional return in the housing market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have identified positive correlations between returns and illiquidity for real estate investments (Benveniste et al 2001;Zheng et al 2015). In line with theoretical expectations, Ametefe et al (2016) find liquidity risk to be generally lower for REITs than for other equities.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Of Illiquidity In Real Estate Marketsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Many studies have identified positive correlations between returns and illiquidity for real estate investments (Benveniste et al 2001;Zheng et al 2015). In line with theoretical expectations, Ametefe et al (2016) find liquidity risk to be generally lower for REITs than for other equities.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Of Illiquidity In Real Estate Marketsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Many studies identify positive correlations between returns and illiquidity for real estate investments (see Benveniste et al, 2001;Zheng et al, 2015). In line with theoretical expectations, they find liquidity risk to be generally lower for REITs than for other equities (Ametefe et al, (2016).…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Of Illiquidity In Real Estate Marketsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Sellers want money and sell their assets to buyers, while buyers bring money or liquidity into the market (Dijk, Geltner, & Minne, 2018). The relative movement of sellers' and buyers' reservation prices over time shows the transaction volume or liquidity (Fisher et al, 2003;Genesove, 2012;Zheng, Chau, & Eddie, 2015;Gong, Zhang, & Zhao, 2018). Specifically, in upward market period the increase of sellers' and buyers' reservation prices drives the increase of the transaction price, while the greater increase of buyers' reservation price than that of buyers leads to more trading or liquidity; Similarly, in downward market the decrease of sellers' and buyers' reservation prices reduces the transaction price, while the greater decrease of buyers' reservation price than that of sellers results in less trading or liquidity (Gong et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "constant liquidity" represents a special case that the sellers match the change of buyers' reservation prices, then the transaction volume or liquidity will be equal over time, and the transaction price change is tracked by the buyer reservation price index. To achieve a deal, the buyers' reservation price should be larger than that of sellers (Fisher et al, 2003;Zheng et al, 2015;Lin & Vandell, 2007), since the reservation prices of sellers and buyers are the minimum and maximum prices that they are willing to accept in a transaction, respectively. In the construction process of Fisher et al (2003), the transaction price is assumed at the midpoint between buyers' and sellers' reservation price.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%