Liquidity cost vs. real investment efficiency

Insider competition under two-dimensional uncertainty and informational asymmetry

“…That is, for example, one insider learns JID: FRL [m3Gsc;June 4, 2016;20:34 ] about a technological shock whereas another insider learns about a demand shock. Such shocks may be independent (e.g., Bade and Hirth, 2016 ). This paper shows that insider trading in an environment with two-dimensional uncertainty provides reversed findings concerning aggregate insider trading profit and market liquidity.…”

Effect of Insider Trading on Market Efficiency

“…Anyhow if all of the stimulations are fulfilled then there is a good chance that all the viable data for merchandizing along with the cost structure that will help in the boon of agents and their spirit hence, optimizing their business to a new height. However, these idealistic components are rarely ever filled in by the agents as (Bade & Hirth, 2016). There is an article by Batten, Loncarski, & Szilagyi (2015) that visualizes a developed and performance oriented along with full flourish merchandizing leading and elevating the cost efficiency.…”

Real estate as an investment asset

“…The relationship of all three variables is described by the behavior of the general investorthe general investor expects a higher return on higher risk, and vice versa [5]. Liquidity then expresses the ability to convert a given investment into a generally convertible asset (money) in a reasonable time at the usual price [6]. Each investor is specific and usually decides according to his / her relation to the assumed level of risk.…”