2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquidation equilibrium with seniority and hidden CDO

Abstract: The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support of the NSERC Canada. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel (ACP), nor those of the Banque de France.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eisenberg and Noe, 2001, Diebold and Yilmaz, 2011, Demange, 2011, Gouriéroux, Héam and Montfort, 2012. The main differences between these papers and ours are (1) our emphasis on deleveraging externalities (they focus on interbank contracts), and (2) the fact that our model is easily calibratable (data on interbank lending are scarce, and often not public, and the literature is mostly theoretical).…”
Section: Relation To Literature On Systemic Riskmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Eisenberg and Noe, 2001, Diebold and Yilmaz, 2011, Demange, 2011, Gouriéroux, Héam and Montfort, 2012. The main differences between these papers and ours are (1) our emphasis on deleveraging externalities (they focus on interbank contracts), and (2) the fact that our model is easily calibratable (data on interbank lending are scarce, and often not public, and the literature is mostly theoretical).…”
Section: Relation To Literature On Systemic Riskmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These differ from debt obligations because they constitute residual claims on assets after creditors have been paid, and there is no nominal limit to how much a claim is worth. Cross-holdings have network spillover effects that can be modeled by an extension of the EisenbergNoe framework that involves solving a nested pair of fixed point problems (as in Elsinger 2009 and related work by Gourieroux, Heam, and Monfort 2013). We briefly outline the argument here.…”
Section: Claims Of Different Senioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, cascades of losses in financial networks have been studied using the Eisenberg-Noe algorithm [32] for computing a market-clearing payment vector (with losses shared proportionally), which was recently extended to multiple seniority levels [31]. The Eisenberg-Noe algorithm is economically meaningful in normal times, but as Cont et al [28] point out, the algorithm is not so reasonable for modeling an extreme event such as the default of a large bank.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%