2020
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202003215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid‐State Templates for Constructing B, N, Co‐Doping Porous Carbons with a Boosting of Potassium‐Ion Storage Performance

Abstract: lithium resources greatly limits the large-scale promotion and application of LIBs. [4-7] As possible candidates, sodium and potassium ion systems are receiving intense attention owing to their low cost and high natural abundant resources. [8-14] Particularly, recent studies indicated that compared with sodium ions, potassium ions exhibited more merits on the basis of its similar intercalation behaviors in graphite and closer redox potential (K/K + , −2.92 V) with Li ions. [15,16] Therefore, potassium ion ener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the total charge transfer process can be divided into faradaic reaction‐controlled and diffusion‐controlled process by the following equation: i = av b , where a and b are adjustable parameters. [ 63 ] A b ‐value close to 0.5 represents a typical diffusion‐controlled process, while a b ‐value close to 1.0 represents an ideal faradaic reaction‐controlled process. Usually, the reaction‐controlled charge storage intrinsically more quickly, while the diffusion‐controlled charge storage is more sluggish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the total charge transfer process can be divided into faradaic reaction‐controlled and diffusion‐controlled process by the following equation: i = av b , where a and b are adjustable parameters. [ 63 ] A b ‐value close to 0.5 represents a typical diffusion‐controlled process, while a b ‐value close to 1.0 represents an ideal faradaic reaction‐controlled process. Usually, the reaction‐controlled charge storage intrinsically more quickly, while the diffusion‐controlled charge storage is more sluggish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NH 4 HB 4 O 7 ·3H 2 O was used as a dopant to generate B 2 O 3 and NH 3 in the heat treatment to simultaneously introduce the doping of B and N atoms in the porous carbons (BN‐PC, Figure 9A). 76 The HRTEM image (Figure 9B) showed several sp 3 defective carbon areas in the continuous sp 2 graphitic carbon conductive network. Based on the results of XPS spectra, the possible formation process of C‐N‐B bonds in BN‐PC was proposed by the model in Figure 9C, where the N element was first doped to the carbon skeleton, and the dopant B atom bonded to the N atom and carbon skeleton.…”
Section: Defective Carbon For Potassium‐ion Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The B‐doped graphene with B 4 C 28 structure (doping concentration of 12.5 at%) was studied to be metallic with good electronic conductivity and possess a large specific capacity of 546 mA h/g with the maximum eight K + adsorptions to graphene layer to form K 8 B 4 C 28 , although without further experimental investigations of this structure. However, B‐doped porous carbon materials were successfully synthesized by a liquid‐state template method using B 2 O 3 as dopant and the elevated specific capacity of carbon materials after B doping was verified 76 …”
Section: Defective Carbon For Potassium‐ion Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strategies include: 1) enhancing specific surface area by introducing nanopores or designing various nanostructures, [ 41–52 ] 2) producing tremendous intrinsic carbon layer defects, [ 36,53 ] and 3) incorporating doped heteroatom functional groups. [ 39,40,54–97 ] Some representative electrochemical results in terms of capacity, cycle stability, and rate performances are summarized in Figure 3e.…”
Section: K+ Storage Mechanism In Carbon Anodementioning
confidence: 99%