2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite into Single- and Few-Layer Graphene with α-Functionalized Alkanes

Abstract: Graphene has unique physical and chemical properties, making it appealing for a number of applications in optoelectronics, sensing, photonics, composites, and smart coatings, just to cite a few. These require the development of production processes that are inexpensive and up-scalable. These criteria are met in liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE), a technique that can be enhanced when specific organic molecules are used. Here we report the exfoliation of graphite in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, in the presence of hene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common methods are liquid phase exfoliation, the reduction of graphene oxide, micromechanical exfoliation, chemical vapor deposition, and the exfoliation of graphite intercalation compounds in organic solvents [8,9,10,11,12]. Among these methods, the liquid phase exfoliation of graphite is the most promising way to produce graphene at a very low cost [13,14,15]. However, almost all reported methods have used surfactants, organic solvents, strong acids, and chemical reagents in order to exfoliate and stabilize in the specific medium [16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods are liquid phase exfoliation, the reduction of graphene oxide, micromechanical exfoliation, chemical vapor deposition, and the exfoliation of graphite intercalation compounds in organic solvents [8,9,10,11,12]. Among these methods, the liquid phase exfoliation of graphite is the most promising way to produce graphene at a very low cost [13,14,15]. However, almost all reported methods have used surfactants, organic solvents, strong acids, and chemical reagents in order to exfoliate and stabilize in the specific medium [16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the much larger SD/SG of G-ds compared to that of graphite can be mainly ascribed to the effect of sonication. Compared to the samples obtained by the LPE method at the presence of linear SRs [13][14][15], this SD/SG value is smaller, which indicates a reduced number of defect sites and again highlights the advantage of using 1 as the SR for the exfoliation of graphite. The 2D peak is known to contain important information about the number of graphene layers [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…An alternative way to improve cg is to use stabilizing reagents (SRs) [13][14][15][16][17]. This strategy can also greatly expand the range of solvents used for the exfoliation of graphite, even in aqueous solutions [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Octylbenzene is a type of alkylbenzene; however, in their research, other molecules were not investigated. It has been under the argument that the alkyl chain [23][24][25][26][27] or aromatic moiety [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] contributes to the graphene dispersion. To make clear the role of the alkyl chain and the aromatic moiety of the dispersant, we synthesized a series of alkylbenzenes and evaluated their graphene dispersing abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%